Odyssey Marine Identifies Possible Shipwreck That Carried 17 Tons of Coins

by CoinNews.net on April 18, 2008 · 3 comments

Spain v. Odyssey Legal Dispute

The name of a 17th-century shipwreck bearing 17 tons of silver and gold coins discovered by Odyssey Marine Exploration may finally be known. News accounts have reported the estimated value of the treasure trove at around $500 million. Whether true or not, the potential value drew immediate attention and a resulting legal battle between Odyssey and Spain.

Magistrate Judge Mark A. Pizzo issued a ruling yesterday denying an Odyssey motion to protect the identity of the shipwreck.

Resulting court fillings revealed that the conclusive identity of the sunken ship Odyssey code-named the "Black Swan" could not yet be made, but they also suggest a possible linkage to Nuestra Senora de las Mercedes y las Animas, a Spanish vessel that sank in the Atlantic Ocean in 1804.

Last year Spain filed legal claims contending the discovered 17-ton treasure of silver and gold coins found at the site is a part of their country’s cultural heritage and should be returned. Odyssey said the treasure was found in international waters and was legally retrieved.

Odyssey had hoped to keep aspects of the shipwreck a secret. In an Odyssey release yesterday entitled Court Seeks Public Disclosure of Odyssey’s Hypotheses Regarding Shipwreck Cases, Greg Stemm, Odyssey’s Co-Founder and Chief Executive Officer said,

 

“As our Motion for Protective Order explained, we had hoped to maintain the confidentiality of information we consider to be speculative. Experience has shown us how difficult it is to prevent unwarranted speculation about the identity and potential value of our finds once the possible identity of a site is made public, but we also respect the need to make sufficient information public to satisfy the requirement to alert potential claimants.”

 

Odyssey also indicated that it had information under review which may be inconsistent with the hypothesis that the wreck site is that of the Mercedes.

In a response today, Spain’s attorney Lawyer James Goold was quoted in the Reuters’ article, Spain rejects U.S. treasure-hunters’ shipwreck claim:

 

The answer Odyssey provided to the court included preposterous claims such as that 17 metric tons of silver coins and hundreds of other artifacts may have (been) thrown overboard from a mystery ship.

“We are proceeding full speed ahead with our investigation and will set the record straight in our May 9 answers to the court about the identity of the shipwreck."

 

Obviously, the legal battle continues.

About the Nuestra Senora de las Mercedes y las Animas shipwreck

The website http://www.treasurelore.com provides interesting background of the Mercedes on its page, Treasure Shipwrecks Around The World. It states:

 

While traveling in a small fleet of four ships returning to Spain from South America in 1804, the Nuestra Señora de las Mercedes, carrying enormous quantities of gold, silver and jewels, was blown up by the British off Cape Santa Maria, Portugal.

Spain was at the time a neutral country, but was showing strong signs of declaring war in alliance with Napoleonic France. Acting on Admiralty orders Vice-Admiral Sir Graham Moore required the Spaniards to change their course and sail for England. The senior Spanish officer, Rear-Admiral Don José Bustamente, refused and opened fire on the British, leading to a short battle during which the Mercedes exploded.

A Spanish account of the Mercedes describes her as “breaking like an egg, dumping her yolk into the deep.” The account also goes on to say that the Mercedes didn’t sink, but that “the decks were awash save for the poop.” Most of the survivors were rescued from the Mercedes’ forecastle after it had separated from the remainder of the hull.

In a letter to Cornwallis, Admiral Moore stated that the four Spanish ships carried 4,436,519 gold and silver pesos, 1,307,634 of which belonged to the king of Spain. After the incident Spain declared war on England.

Odyssey new release, Court Seeks Public Disclosure of Odyssey’s Hypotheses Regarding Shipwreck Cases

The entire press release by Odyssey is embedded below.

Odyssey Marine Exploration, Inc. (NasdaqCM: OMEX), the world leader in the field of deep-ocean shipwreck exploration, announced that today Magistrate Judge Mark A. Pizzo of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida denied Odyssey’s Motion for Protective Order in which Odyssey requested that the interrogatory responses filed under seal on April 14, 2008, remain confidential. In those interrogatories, Odyssey was asked to put forth its working hypothesis as to the identity of any vessels that may be related to the two sites that are the subjects of two arrests Odyssey has pending before the Court. Odyssey had been reluctant to disclose its working hypotheses because the company believes that there is insufficient evidence in either case to conclusively confirm the identity of any vessel that may be associated with the sites. 

Odyssey had hoped to more fully explain its reasons for its confidentiality request but Odyssey’s motion to hold a hearing in camera rather than in open court was denied. As a result, with the Court’s order, and with Magistrate Pizzo’s specific caution about his expectations for justification for Protective Orders, the public will now be aware of speculation about possible identities of the sites in question.

A vessel named as possibly being related to the site which is the subject of case number 8:07-CV-00614-SDM-MAP is the Nuestra Señora de las Mercedes y las Animas (the “Mercedes“), a Spanish vessel that had been assigned to transport mail, private passengers and consignments of merchant goods and other cargoes at the time of its sinking in 1804. In its response to the Court’s interrogatory, Odyssey also indicated that it had information under review which may be inconsistent with the hypothesis that the wreck site is that of the Mercedes

Odyssey named the Merchant Royall, a British merchant vessel lost in 1641, as a possible identity of the vessel related to case number 8:06-CV-01685-SDM-MAP. Odyssey again indicated that it had information under review in that case which could be inconsistent with that hypothesis. 

“We are all on new ground here and managing the disclosure obligations of a public company against the release of information in an Admiralty case like this is a complicated balance,” commented Melinda MacConnel, Odyssey’s General Counsel. “Judge Pizzo had previously invited us to submit a proposed protective order, which we did. In response, he has now made it abundantly clear how he wants us to proceed with public disclosures, and we will obviously fully comply.” 

“As our Motion for Protective Order explained, we had hoped to maintain the confidentiality of information we consider to be speculative” said Greg Stemm, Odyssey’s Co-Founder and Chief Executive Officer. “Experience has shown us how difficult it is to prevent unwarranted speculation about the identity and potential value of our finds once the possible identity of a site is made public, but we also respect the need to make sufficient information public to satisfy the requirement to alert potential claimants.” 

About Odyssey Marine Exploration 

Odyssey Marine Exploration, Inc. (NasdaqCM: OMEX) is engaged in the exploration of deep-water shipwrecks and uses innovative methods and state-of-the-art technology to conduct extensive deep-ocean search and archaeological recovery operations around the world. Odyssey discovered the Civil War era shipwreck of the SS Republic in 2003 and recovered over 50,000 coins and 14,000 artifacts from the site nearly 1,700 feet deep. In May 2007, the Company announced the largest historic deep-ocean treasure recovery of over 500,000 silver and gold coins, weighing 17 tons, from a Colonial era site code-named “Black Swan.” Odyssey has several shipwreck projects in various stages of development around the world. 

Odyssey offers various ways to share in the excitement of deep-ocean exploration by making shipwreck treasures and artifacts available to collectors, the general public and students through its webstore, exhibits, books, videos, merchandise, and educational programs. Odyssey’s “SHIPWRECK! Pirates & Treasure” exhibit recently ended its successful seven month engagement at the Tampa Museum of Science and Industry and is currently on display at the Detroit Science Center. For details on the Company’s activities and its commitment to the preservation of maritime heritage please visit www.shipwreck.net. 

For additional information, please contact Natja Igney, Odyssey’s Manager of Corporate Communications, at 813-876-1776 ext. 2553. 


# # #


Odyssey Marine Exploration believes the information set forth in this Press Release may include “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Act of 1934. Certain factors that could cause results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements are set forth in “Risk Factors” in the Part I, Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, which has been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Odyssey Marine Exploration, Inc. v. The Unidentified, Shipwrecked Vessel or Vessels, Filing 110

The following is Magistrate Judge Mark A. Pizzo orders on 4/17/2008 denying the protective order to keep the identify of the shipwreck a secret.

{ 3 comments… read them below or add one }

Jack fender September 24, 2009 at 9:38 pm

I think Spaim has some nerve to claim this hoard of treasure, they invaded South America and stole it from the indigenous people who lived their. Give the money to the heirs of those peoples, mostly the poor.

Daveyo June 12, 2011 at 10:24 am

The spanish at that time were well known to Rob and loot other kingdoms from Central and South America, and even killed many in their quest to obtain gold and silver. Spain never brought such out from their country, which means the ships left the ports from Spain EMPTY, so if such was coming from another country, Spain cannot legally lay claim over the discovery because this hoard belongs to someone else which can range from Central America to South America. Third since it was found in international waters it belongs to anyone who wishes to lay claim on the hoard. The question is where did this ship depart from??? Make Spain explain that part on how it is possible that this gold and silver originally belongs to them. They never brought it out from Spain, so how come now Spain got all this coming back to them???

If I was the Judge, I would void the claim by Spain instantly because they committed crimes in high seas robbing other nations and countries. End of story.

Daveyo

Lisa Underwood July 9, 2011 at 11:28 pm

If the items found at the shipwreck had been glass bottles or pots and pans do you think Spain would be so quick to want to claim their “cultural heritage”? Of course not. But, because we’re talking “big bucks” everything changes. Spain should be ashamed of itself. If they were sincere about the cultural heritage claim they would be happy with a few coins to put in each of their museums thru out the country so their people could view them. And while Spain is at it they should also tell how they enslaved the native peoples of Peru in order to come by the coins in the first place.

Leave a Comment