<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: COINS Act Seeks 1c Coin and $1 Note Elimination; 5c Composition Change	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.coinnews.net/2017/04/12/coins-act-seeks-1c-coin-and-1-note-elimination/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2017/04/12/coins-act-seeks-1c-coin-and-1-note-elimination/</link>
	<description>CoinNews delivers the latest World and US coin news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 00:17:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Steve Gonzales		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2017/04/12/coins-act-seeks-1c-coin-and-1-note-elimination/#comment-227834</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Gonzales]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 00:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=62409#comment-227834</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[There is such a glut of pennies out there does not make Sense (cents) to be producing them! Especially since we are loosing money. Hopefully President Trump will pass this bill reducing the deficit was his plan! Great Work Sen. Mcain. Hopefully the lobbyists will not have the power to block.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is such a glut of pennies out there does not make Sense (cents) to be producing them! Especially since we are loosing money. Hopefully President Trump will pass this bill reducing the deficit was his plan! Great Work Sen. Mcain. Hopefully the lobbyists will not have the power to block.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Clifford Johnson		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2017/04/12/coins-act-seeks-1c-coin-and-1-note-elimination/#comment-217624</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clifford Johnson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2017 20:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=62409#comment-217624</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.coinnews.net/2017/04/12/coins-act-seeks-1c-coin-and-1-note-elimination/#comment-217623&quot;&gt;JB&lt;/a&gt;.

As my previous comment states, the actual savings would be ten times the GAO&#039;s estimate, owing to the GAO&#039;s failure to incorporate the Treasury&#039;s $1 per $1 coin debt reduction.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.coinnews.net/2017/04/12/coins-act-seeks-1c-coin-and-1-note-elimination/#comment-217623">JB</a>.</p>
<p>As my previous comment states, the actual savings would be ten times the GAO&#8217;s estimate, owing to the GAO&#8217;s failure to incorporate the Treasury&#8217;s $1 per $1 coin debt reduction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: JB		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2017/04/12/coins-act-seeks-1c-coin-and-1-note-elimination/#comment-217623</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JB]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2017 20:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=62409#comment-217623</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The $5.5 billion savings over 30 years will never even be noticed the way our government goes through money. The savings per year would be just over 183 million, which in government terms is almost nothing. Sure the mint will save but it will be spent somewhere else.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The $5.5 billion savings over 30 years will never even be noticed the way our government goes through money. The savings per year would be just over 183 million, which in government terms is almost nothing. Sure the mint will save but it will be spent somewhere else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: joera		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2017/04/12/coins-act-seeks-1c-coin-and-1-note-elimination/#comment-216785</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[joera]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Apr 2017 10:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=62409#comment-216785</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This has been in the talks for a while now. Maybe it WILL happen this time. And maybe it would be a good time to put the half dollar back into circulation. But why would it be a 10 year period before it is all said and done.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This has been in the talks for a while now. Maybe it WILL happen this time. And maybe it would be a good time to put the half dollar back into circulation. But why would it be a 10 year period before it is all said and done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Munzen		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2017/04/12/coins-act-seeks-1c-coin-and-1-note-elimination/#comment-216531</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Munzen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2017 13:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=62409#comment-216531</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;The $2 coin could be cent-sized&quot;
Definitely, although there&#039;d have to be enough differences to avoid confusion, not to mention re-use of old 1¢ coins. The Australian $2 coin is a good example that a small, higher-denomination coin can be successful. It&#039;s 20.5 mm in diameter (very close to our cent&#039;s 19 mm) but has a distinctive thickness and color.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The $2 coin could be cent-sized&#8221;<br />
Definitely, although there&#8217;d have to be enough differences to avoid confusion, not to mention re-use of old 1¢ coins. The Australian $2 coin is a good example that a small, higher-denomination coin can be successful. It&#8217;s 20.5 mm in diameter (very close to our cent&#8217;s 19 mm) but has a distinctive thickness and color.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Clifford Johnson		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2017/04/12/coins-act-seeks-1c-coin-and-1-note-elimination/#comment-216440</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clifford Johnson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2017 03:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=62409#comment-216440</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.coinnews.net/2017/04/12/coins-act-seeks-1c-coin-and-1-note-elimination/#comment-216420&quot;&gt;Munzen&lt;/a&gt;.

The $2 coin could be cent-sized.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.coinnews.net/2017/04/12/coins-act-seeks-1c-coin-and-1-note-elimination/#comment-216420">Munzen</a>.</p>
<p>The $2 coin could be cent-sized.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Munzen		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2017/04/12/coins-act-seeks-1c-coin-and-1-note-elimination/#comment-216420</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Munzen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2017 00:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=62409#comment-216420</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The COINS Act conspicuously ignores the fact that every other country which replaced its $1 (or equivalent) bill also has a widely-circulating $2 denomination. Having both denominations greatly simplifies change-making AND negates the standard &quot;pocket full of $1 coins&quot; objection of the naysayers - any dollar amount less than five bucks can be given with at most two coins instead of the four needed in its absence. 

Ideally a $2 coin should be introduced at the same time as the $1 bill is ended. It should be small and distinctive, perhaps multi-sided and/or bimetallic. However given the politics surrounding ANY &quot;change to our change&quot;, it might be more palatable to follow Canada&#039;s course and simply increase $2 bill production for several years until the $1 coin has established itself. While continuing to print lower-denomination notes wouldn&#039;t save the Treasury as much as eliminating everything less than $5, with $1 notes making up roughly 45% of the BEP&#039;s output simply cutting that number by half would be a major improvement.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The COINS Act conspicuously ignores the fact that every other country which replaced its $1 (or equivalent) bill also has a widely-circulating $2 denomination. Having both denominations greatly simplifies change-making AND negates the standard &#8220;pocket full of $1 coins&#8221; objection of the naysayers &#8211; any dollar amount less than five bucks can be given with at most two coins instead of the four needed in its absence. </p>
<p>Ideally a $2 coin should be introduced at the same time as the $1 bill is ended. It should be small and distinctive, perhaps multi-sided and/or bimetallic. However given the politics surrounding ANY &#8220;change to our change&#8221;, it might be more palatable to follow Canada&#8217;s course and simply increase $2 bill production for several years until the $1 coin has established itself. While continuing to print lower-denomination notes wouldn&#8217;t save the Treasury as much as eliminating everything less than $5, with $1 notes making up roughly 45% of the BEP&#8217;s output simply cutting that number by half would be a major improvement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lee		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2017/04/12/coins-act-seeks-1c-coin-and-1-note-elimination/#comment-216406</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2017 21:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=62409#comment-216406</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The penny is a loser - yes.  
But elimination of thie bill will cost everyone reading this more money as a whole.  The government studies do not cover the realities of increased costs to consumers that happen in the real world. 

Yes - taxpayer money is saved THEORETICALLY and ON PAPER to look good for politicians.  But the reality is that, just like when Canada eliminated one dollar bills, the costs to consumers on a daily basis rise from two main occurences:

1.  When the dollar &quot;psychologically&quot; becomes the &quot;new quarter,&quot; retailers take advantage of this and jack up prices.  It DID happen this way in Canada when their one dollar coin was introduced.  I was there.
  In fact the dollar coin aided the inflation rate enough that their dollar soon became trivial enough Canada introduced a two dollar coin.  And, BTW, the news releases of those days show the Canadians felt forced into something they did not want.

2.  The costs from large service providers such as banks, and those companies who deal with major amounts of change like vendors WILL rise in cost for the consumer b/c, as the Canadian bank told me back then, it costs a LOT more to ship 1,000,000 of coins instead of 1,000,000 in bills.  So they pass the cost increases on to consumers.

Even small time venders will have to deal with weight and space inconvenience.

Its about the consumers giving up CONVENIENCE and paying more for daily services.  Its not about politicians saying they can save taxpayer money.

If they really cared about saving taxpayer money - they never would have approved the making of the presidential dollar series since history shows EVERY dollar coin in US history was not accepted by the general populace who want bills for convenience sake.  Now that they have egg on their face once again, and the dollar coins are sitting, unused in government vaults (as all previous dollar coins did), some politician is seeing a way to say he can save taxpayer dollars ad not tell the facts its all politics and will cost us more.

Here is my &quot;I told you so,&quot; ahead of time.  History will repeat itself if this ridiculous law to eliminate dollar bills is passed.  You WILL be paying more for everything.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The penny is a loser &#8211; yes.<br />
But elimination of thie bill will cost everyone reading this more money as a whole.  The government studies do not cover the realities of increased costs to consumers that happen in the real world. </p>
<p>Yes &#8211; taxpayer money is saved THEORETICALLY and ON PAPER to look good for politicians.  But the reality is that, just like when Canada eliminated one dollar bills, the costs to consumers on a daily basis rise from two main occurences:</p>
<p>1.  When the dollar &#8220;psychologically&#8221; becomes the &#8220;new quarter,&#8221; retailers take advantage of this and jack up prices.  It DID happen this way in Canada when their one dollar coin was introduced.  I was there.<br />
  In fact the dollar coin aided the inflation rate enough that their dollar soon became trivial enough Canada introduced a two dollar coin.  And, BTW, the news releases of those days show the Canadians felt forced into something they did not want.</p>
<p>2.  The costs from large service providers such as banks, and those companies who deal with major amounts of change like vendors WILL rise in cost for the consumer b/c, as the Canadian bank told me back then, it costs a LOT more to ship 1,000,000 of coins instead of 1,000,000 in bills.  So they pass the cost increases on to consumers.</p>
<p>Even small time venders will have to deal with weight and space inconvenience.</p>
<p>Its about the consumers giving up CONVENIENCE and paying more for daily services.  Its not about politicians saying they can save taxpayer money.</p>
<p>If they really cared about saving taxpayer money &#8211; they never would have approved the making of the presidential dollar series since history shows EVERY dollar coin in US history was not accepted by the general populace who want bills for convenience sake.  Now that they have egg on their face once again, and the dollar coins are sitting, unused in government vaults (as all previous dollar coins did), some politician is seeing a way to say he can save taxpayer dollars ad not tell the facts its all politics and will cost us more.</p>
<p>Here is my &#8220;I told you so,&#8221; ahead of time.  History will repeat itself if this ridiculous law to eliminate dollar bills is passed.  You WILL be paying more for everything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Clifford Johnson		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2017/04/12/coins-act-seeks-1c-coin-and-1-note-elimination/#comment-216401</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clifford Johnson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2017 20:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=62409#comment-216401</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ideally, the $1 coin should be redesigned, to match the size of the eliminated penny.  Although pretty, the bulk of the $1 coin renders it inconvenient.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ideally, the $1 coin should be redesigned, to match the size of the eliminated penny.  Although pretty, the bulk of the $1 coin renders it inconvenient.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Clifford Johnson		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2017/04/12/coins-act-seeks-1c-coin-and-1-note-elimination/#comment-216399</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clifford Johnson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2017 20:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=62409#comment-216399</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[As ever, this article cites cost savings that completely ignore the $1 public debt reduction that accrues to the US Treasury from issuing each $1 coin.  (There is no countervailing public debt increase due to $1 federal reserve notes being withdrawn, since they are issued by the twelve privately-owned federal reserve banks.)  As a result, the benefits to the government over the same (30 year) period, based on the same production schedules, are some $50 billion more than the given estimates.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As ever, this article cites cost savings that completely ignore the $1 public debt reduction that accrues to the US Treasury from issuing each $1 coin.  (There is no countervailing public debt increase due to $1 federal reserve notes being withdrawn, since they are issued by the twelve privately-owned federal reserve banks.)  As a result, the benefits to the government over the same (30 year) period, based on the same production schedules, are some $50 billion more than the given estimates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
