<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: UHR Gold Coin, Silver Medal Approved; New Silver Eagle Design Out	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.coinnews.net/2014/07/23/uhr-gold-coin-silver-medal-approved-new-silver-eagle-design-out/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2014/07/23/uhr-gold-coin-silver-medal-approved-new-silver-eagle-design-out/</link>
	<description>CoinNews delivers the latest World and US coin news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2014 00:13:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: James		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2014/07/23/uhr-gold-coin-silver-medal-approved-new-silver-eagle-design-out/#comment-98695</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2014 00:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=45990#comment-98695</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Well crap, I hate they didn&#039;t change the design of the ASE.  Unfortuantly the bullion variety of the ASE is not worth much more than scrap value and a design change would have definitely, as RonnieBGood mentioned in his comment above, increase the value of the pre-2014&#039;s and also the 2015&#039;s. Now, we don&#039;t have much more than a silver trade round in value.  Maybe they will find a new design they like and approve it next time.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well crap, I hate they didn&#8217;t change the design of the ASE.  Unfortuantly the bullion variety of the ASE is not worth much more than scrap value and a design change would have definitely, as RonnieBGood mentioned in his comment above, increase the value of the pre-2014&#8217;s and also the 2015&#8217;s. Now, we don&#8217;t have much more than a silver trade round in value.  Maybe they will find a new design they like and approve it next time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: jim		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2014/07/23/uhr-gold-coin-silver-medal-approved-new-silver-eagle-design-out/#comment-86619</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2014 17:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=45990#comment-86619</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.coinnews.net/2014/07/23/uhr-gold-coin-silver-medal-approved-new-silver-eagle-design-out/#comment-86462&quot;&gt;steve1942&lt;/a&gt;.

Awww, you can do it. It&#039;s just one oz. of gold and whenever they release the coins they&#039;ll probably give plenty of time for everybody and their brother to save up and buy in.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.coinnews.net/2014/07/23/uhr-gold-coin-silver-medal-approved-new-silver-eagle-design-out/#comment-86462">steve1942</a>.</p>
<p>Awww, you can do it. It&#8217;s just one oz. of gold and whenever they release the coins they&#8217;ll probably give plenty of time for everybody and their brother to save up and buy in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: steve1942		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2014/07/23/uhr-gold-coin-silver-medal-approved-new-silver-eagle-design-out/#comment-86462</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[steve1942]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2014 16:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=45990#comment-86462</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I own the 2009 but doubt if my finances will allow me to continue the series.  I must say, though, the redesigned eagle is beautiful.  When all is said and done, I doubt that we will ever see it on the coin.  Too bad, it is really nice.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I own the 2009 but doubt if my finances will allow me to continue the series.  I must say, though, the redesigned eagle is beautiful.  When all is said and done, I doubt that we will ever see it on the coin.  Too bad, it is really nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: RonnieBGood		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2014/07/23/uhr-gold-coin-silver-medal-approved-new-silver-eagle-design-out/#comment-86459</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RonnieBGood]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2014 16:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=45990#comment-86459</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Also in favor of this series.
It will not reduce the value of the 2009 UHR. It will increase it. The 2009 now becomes the 1st in the series. Get one now if you don&#039;t have one.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also in favor of this series.<br />
It will not reduce the value of the 2009 UHR. It will increase it. The 2009 now becomes the 1st in the series. Get one now if you don&#8217;t have one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: tom		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2014/07/23/uhr-gold-coin-silver-medal-approved-new-silver-eagle-design-out/#comment-86433</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2014 14:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=45990#comment-86433</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[the new eagle proposed looks great, I am a buyer on the coin.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the new eagle proposed looks great, I am a buyer on the coin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: jim		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2014/07/23/uhr-gold-coin-silver-medal-approved-new-silver-eagle-design-out/#comment-86372</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2014 05:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=45990#comment-86372</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[So apparently the CCAC got enough heat about their redesign of the ASE that they changed their recommendation. Good for them, I guess they&#039;re listening.

Sorry Saint-Gaudens but I like the new proposed eagle better than the original. Starting a new series of UHR releases every 5-6 years with a different reverse each release?

From a distance it looks to me like the face of Lady Liberty has some kind or robotic/alien origin mask already. That would definitely be a modern rendition.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So apparently the CCAC got enough heat about their redesign of the ASE that they changed their recommendation. Good for them, I guess they&#8217;re listening.</p>
<p>Sorry Saint-Gaudens but I like the new proposed eagle better than the original. Starting a new series of UHR releases every 5-6 years with a different reverse each release?</p>
<p>From a distance it looks to me like the face of Lady Liberty has some kind or robotic/alien origin mask already. That would definitely be a modern rendition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
