Nice set. Thanks for the memories (1964 – 2025). We’ll see how the 2027s look like.

Currently he is ‘out of the loop’ past deeds done wrong indeed. But, he’s a piker really….

Don’t forget Hunter

I thinks Messers. Brinks, Kushner, Jr., amd others will possess these trinkets before any of us see them in the wyld

The End of an Era.

Peace Out

E1,

Your 40% Silver Kennedy subset is looking primo, no spots nice job!
My business strike ’64-’70 toner set is about half complete. A work in progress.

Rick,

I was on a fly about and I’m back now.

Yes, that coin was a PCGS PR70 DCAM. Such a spotted bummer. I have more on the way though. We’ll see how those go. I might get another chance at a spot free example with the 2025 LESPS release.

Also, I was able to finish my 1965-1970 40% Kennedy Sub-set. I think it turned out pretty good. MS-66 across the board for the business uncs. Matched grade and matched certification. Some other upgrades in there too.

Other than that, I’m swamped again. Gotta run Bro……Run Forest, Run…..

Cheers

E1, it’s about time you showed up.

Sorry to see your Kennedy like that, it’s bad. I thought you ordered a 70-DCAM? Please tell me it’s a 69DCAM. Something went really bad with the silver proof sets as Cali noted. That coin may have turned in the plastic? You’re right, it’s a gamble.
I got lucky, yes & no. Sup-silver #1 had an amazing planchet, but a ding dashed a chance at 70. Sup #2 above was ding free and made the grade, despite having a minor inconsistency with the ag mixture seen in bright light.

Over the last year I’ve had a few ‘questionable’ silvers come my way. One MS & 3 PF’s:
1) ’24 FHS – milk spots and growing.
2) ’25 Army Privy – milk spot w/impurity speck in the center of spot (like yours).
3) ’25 S-Proof ASE #1 – milk spot w/impurity speck in the center of spot.
4) ’25 S-Proof ASE #2 below – ‘minor’ perimeter haze, and a slight planchet flaw (not in pic). I sent the coin in with my fingers crossed; it didn’t work ↓

Good to talk to you E1.

PS: Look at that reeded edge ‘spillover’ on the zoom pic. never seen that before. Nice job S-Mint.

Antonio,

I think the only logical option will be to return the coin to PCGS and pay to have it conserved and re-holdered. The coin appears to have been poorly conserved once already.