<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Trump Picks Louisiana&#8217;s Paul Hollis for U.S. Mint Director	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.coinnews.net/2025/07/18/trump-picks-louisianas-paul-hollis-for-u-s-mint-director/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2025/07/18/trump-picks-louisianas-paul-hollis-for-u-s-mint-director/</link>
	<description>CoinNews delivers the latest World and US coin news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2025 02:56:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Rick		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2025/07/18/trump-picks-louisianas-paul-hollis-for-u-s-mint-director/#comment-562398</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2025 02:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.coinnews.net/?p=110730#comment-562398</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.coinnews.net/2025/07/18/trump-picks-louisianas-paul-hollis-for-u-s-mint-director/#comment-562387&quot;&gt;Wayne Pearson&lt;/a&gt;.

&quot;&lt;span&gt;I understand there are additional costs&quot;... Do you?&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span&gt;The materials for the cent is peanuts compared to everything else.&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span&gt;Here we go again - the Mint shenanigan narrative is back.&lt;/span&gt;

How much does it cost to package the cents, how about the production of dozens of dies, maintaining the myriad of equipment from start to finish and paying the water &#038; electric bills? That&#039;s right, the Mint washes &#038; rinses billions of cents. I could go on and on, and I haven&#039;t&#039; even mentioned the associated costs for the humans in the shops, offices, and in DC....]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.coinnews.net/2025/07/18/trump-picks-louisianas-paul-hollis-for-u-s-mint-director/#comment-562387">Wayne Pearson</a>.</p>
<p>&#8220;<span>I understand there are additional costs&#8221;&#8230; Do you?</span><br />
<span>The materials for the cent is peanuts compared to everything else.</span><br />
<span>Here we go again &#8211; the Mint shenanigan narrative is back.</span></p>
<p>How much does it cost to package the cents, how about the production of dozens of dies, maintaining the myriad of equipment from start to finish and paying the water &amp; electric bills? That&#8217;s right, the Mint washes &amp; rinses billions of cents. I could go on and on, and I haven&#8217;t&#8217; even mentioned the associated costs for the humans in the shops, offices, and in DC&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Wayne Pearson		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2025/07/18/trump-picks-louisianas-paul-hollis-for-u-s-mint-director/#comment-562387</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wayne Pearson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2025 20:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.coinnews.net/?p=110730#comment-562387</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m glad Paul is a coin collector.
I also hope he wants to save the cent. I don&#039;t believe the production costs we are being told is accurate.
I looked up copper-approx $4 a pound, Zinc $1.30.
You can get 145 cents out of a pound of copper. Copper has 453.592 grams divided by 3.11 grams =145. that&#039;s copper pre-1982.
You can get 181 cents out of a pound of zinc. It also has 453.592 grams divided by the current 2.5 grams =181.
$4 (pound of copper) divided by the 145 cents =.027
$1.30 (pound of zinc) divided by the 181 cents =.007
Adding them together using both prices for pure copper and pure zinc you get .034 cents.
So just zinc alone .007 cents with a micro&#160;thin copper plating there is no way we&#039;re being told the truth.
I understand there are additional costs but I believe we&#039;re being lied to about the actual production costs.&#160;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad Paul is a coin collector.<br />
I also hope he wants to save the cent. I don&#8217;t believe the production costs we are being told is accurate.<br />
I looked up copper-approx $4 a pound, Zinc $1.30.<br />
You can get 145 cents out of a pound of copper. Copper has 453.592 grams divided by 3.11 grams =145. that&#8217;s copper pre-1982.<br />
You can get 181 cents out of a pound of zinc. It also has 453.592 grams divided by the current 2.5 grams =181.<br />
$4 (pound of copper) divided by the 145 cents =.027<br />
$1.30 (pound of zinc) divided by the 181 cents =.007<br />
Adding them together using both prices for pure copper and pure zinc you get .034 cents.<br />
So just zinc alone .007 cents with a micro&nbsp;thin copper plating there is no way we&#8217;re being told the truth.<br />
I understand there are additional costs but I believe we&#8217;re being lied to about the actual production costs.&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: HarryB		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2025/07/18/trump-picks-louisianas-paul-hollis-for-u-s-mint-director/#comment-562064</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[HarryB]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2025 17:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.coinnews.net/?p=110730#comment-562064</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.coinnews.net/2025/07/18/trump-picks-louisianas-paul-hollis-for-u-s-mint-director/#comment-562063&quot;&gt;E 1&lt;/a&gt;.

I am expecting every bar weight recorded……I am more concerned by some who think a complete audit requires assaying every bar…..]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.coinnews.net/2025/07/18/trump-picks-louisianas-paul-hollis-for-u-s-mint-director/#comment-562063">E 1</a>.</p>
<p>I am expecting every bar weight recorded……I am more concerned by some who think a complete audit requires assaying every bar…..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: E 1		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2025/07/18/trump-picks-louisianas-paul-hollis-for-u-s-mint-director/#comment-562063</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[E 1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2025 17:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.coinnews.net/?p=110730#comment-562063</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.coinnews.net/2025/07/18/trump-picks-louisianas-paul-hollis-for-u-s-mint-director/#comment-562049&quot;&gt;E 1&lt;/a&gt;.

The next question concerning the Fort Knox inventory. Will it strictly be the counting of bullion bars only or will it be an attempt to carefully weigh everything?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.coinnews.net/2025/07/18/trump-picks-louisianas-paul-hollis-for-u-s-mint-director/#comment-562049">E 1</a>.</p>
<p>The next question concerning the Fort Knox inventory. Will it strictly be the counting of bullion bars only or will it be an attempt to carefully weigh everything?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rick		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2025/07/18/trump-picks-louisianas-paul-hollis-for-u-s-mint-director/#comment-562052</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2025 05:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.coinnews.net/?p=110730#comment-562052</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.coinnews.net/2025/07/18/trump-picks-louisianas-paul-hollis-for-u-s-mint-director/#comment-562027&quot;&gt;John Q. Coinage&lt;/a&gt;.

I&#039;m hoping for straight crosses on both, and if one misses the cut, so be it.
The nice toner wins, or the ugly toner wins, or both cross? We&#039;ll see!

Thanks for your feedback J...

Here pictured was a good cross from last year, and I waived the min grade option(my unsafe selection), yikes.
However, the Morgan had a Gold Bean, and I knew it would upgrade...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.coinnews.net/2025/07/18/trump-picks-louisianas-paul-hollis-for-u-s-mint-director/#comment-562027">John Q. Coinage</a>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m hoping for straight crosses on both, and if one misses the cut, so be it.<br />
The nice toner wins, or the ugly toner wins, or both cross? We&#8217;ll see!</p>
<p>Thanks for your feedback J&#8230;</p>
<p>Here pictured was a good cross from last year, and I waived the min grade option(my unsafe selection), yikes.<br />
However, the Morgan had a Gold Bean, and I knew it would upgrade&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rick		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2025/07/18/trump-picks-louisianas-paul-hollis-for-u-s-mint-director/#comment-562051</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2025 05:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.coinnews.net/?p=110730#comment-562051</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.coinnews.net/2025/07/18/trump-picks-louisianas-paul-hollis-for-u-s-mint-director/#comment-561991&quot;&gt;CaliSkier&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks for your feedback Cali!

That&#039;s two successful cross bids(you &#038; E1) for the &#039;64-D, zilch for the lowly 68-D, boo-hoo!
Mushy &#038; marked up shield, off center strike, and a tight lipped eagle beak on the &#039;68-D - who&#039;s counting haha!?

Well, lucky for me, if either the &#039;68-D &lt;em&gt;or &lt;/em&gt;the &#039;64-D DNC(Did Not Cross), I&#039;m good, and I&#039;m covered. Losing just the &quot;+&quot; alone on the top pop &#039;68-D MS67+ would cost dearly. Approx 75% of value is lost if I lose the &quot;+&quot; (PCGS &#038; NGC price guides). 75% equates to a potential $3400 drop in value if the &quot;+&#039;&#039; is dropped on the &#039;68-D MS67+. Wow, and not good. It ain&#039;t gonna to happen!  

When crossing from one TPG to the other you have options to protect &#038; preserve the current grade as holdered (my safe selection). You have the option to enter a minimum grade to cross, and I chose the current grade as holdered by NGC. 
If they agree with the grade on the NGC holder &lt;em&gt;while still holdered&lt;/em&gt;, they&#039;ll crack it out and slab-er-up fresh with the same grade as before.
If they don&#039;t agree with the grade on the NGC holder &lt;em&gt;while still holdered, &lt;/em&gt;they&#039;ll send it back untouched, so to speak.
https://www.pcgs.com/crossover

Here&#039;s a pic of a couple of &quot;DNC&#039;s&quot; from last year ⇊, boo-hoo!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.coinnews.net/2025/07/18/trump-picks-louisianas-paul-hollis-for-u-s-mint-director/#comment-561991">CaliSkier</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks for your feedback Cali!</p>
<p>That&#8217;s two successful cross bids(you &amp; E1) for the &#8217;64-D, zilch for the lowly 68-D, boo-hoo!<br />
Mushy &amp; marked up shield, off center strike, and a tight lipped eagle beak on the &#8217;68-D &#8211; who&#8217;s counting haha!?</p>
<p>Well, lucky for me, if either the &#8217;68-D <em>or </em>the &#8217;64-D DNC(Did Not Cross), I&#8217;m good, and I&#8217;m covered. Losing just the &#8220;+&#8221; alone on the top pop &#8217;68-D MS67+ would cost dearly. Approx 75% of value is lost if I lose the &#8220;+&#8221; (PCGS &amp; NGC price guides). 75% equates to a potential $3400 drop in value if the &#8220;+&#8221; is dropped on the &#8217;68-D MS67+. Wow, and not good. It ain&#8217;t gonna to happen!  </p>
<p>When crossing from one TPG to the other you have options to protect &amp; preserve the current grade as holdered (my safe selection). You have the option to enter a minimum grade to cross, and I chose the current grade as holdered by NGC.<br />
If they agree with the grade on the NGC holder <em>while still holdered</em>, they&#8217;ll crack it out and slab-er-up fresh with the same grade as before.<br />
If they don&#8217;t agree with the grade on the NGC holder <em>while still holdered, </em>they&#8217;ll send it back untouched, so to speak.<br />
<a href="https://www.pcgs.com/crossover" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.pcgs.com/crossover</a></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a pic of a couple of &#8220;DNC&#8217;s&#8221; from last year ⇊, boo-hoo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: E 1		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2025/07/18/trump-picks-louisianas-paul-hollis-for-u-s-mint-director/#comment-562049</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[E 1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2025 04:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.coinnews.net/?p=110730#comment-562049</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.coinnews.net/2025/07/18/trump-picks-louisianas-paul-hollis-for-u-s-mint-director/#comment-562041&quot;&gt;sharks2th&lt;/a&gt;.

Sharks2th,

I am sure the Metrology Group at Ft. Knox knows the difference. However, I am just curious for myself as to which weight standard they actually use and accept. IMHO, for international exchange reasons, SI Units (Kilograms or Metric Tons) should be used across the board, especially since the US purposively converted to the Metric System in 1975. However, some legacy practices may have remained behind.

 
1 Metric Ton = 32,000 ounces is close enough for the purpose of this discussion. It does leave a delta of 150 ounces per ton or $0.50M/ton @ $107.2M/ton or a percent difference of 0.5% or half of a percent.

I think we may have gone to the same school. The one that likes to split hairs.

Cheers]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.coinnews.net/2025/07/18/trump-picks-louisianas-paul-hollis-for-u-s-mint-director/#comment-562041">sharks2th</a>.</p>
<p>Sharks2th,</p>
<p>I am sure the Metrology Group at Ft. Knox knows the difference. However, I am just curious for myself as to which weight standard they actually use and accept. IMHO, for international exchange reasons, SI Units (Kilograms or Metric Tons) should be used across the board, especially since the US purposively converted to the Metric System in 1975. However, some legacy practices may have remained behind.</p>
<p>1 Metric Ton = 32,000 ounces is close enough for the purpose of this discussion. It does leave a delta of 150 ounces per ton or $0.50M/ton @ $107.2M/ton or a percent difference of 0.5% or half of a percent.</p>
<p>I think we may have gone to the same school. The one that likes to split hairs.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: HarryB		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2025/07/18/trump-picks-louisianas-paul-hollis-for-u-s-mint-director/#comment-562045</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[HarryB]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2025 01:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.coinnews.net/?p=110730#comment-562045</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.coinnews.net/2025/07/18/trump-picks-louisianas-paul-hollis-for-u-s-mint-director/#comment-562041&quot;&gt;sharks2th&lt;/a&gt;.

Shark: thanks for the precise measurements and their corresponding terminology. I’m sure the proper definitions will be utilized if any physical audit of Ft Knox gold is ever conducted.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.coinnews.net/2025/07/18/trump-picks-louisianas-paul-hollis-for-u-s-mint-director/#comment-562041">sharks2th</a>.</p>
<p>Shark: thanks for the precise measurements and their corresponding terminology. I’m sure the proper definitions will be utilized if any physical audit of Ft Knox gold is ever conducted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: sharks2th		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2025/07/18/trump-picks-louisianas-paul-hollis-for-u-s-mint-director/#comment-562041</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sharks2th]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2025 01:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.coinnews.net/?p=110730#comment-562041</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.coinnews.net/2025/07/18/trump-picks-louisianas-paul-hollis-for-u-s-mint-director/#comment-561996&quot;&gt;E 1&lt;/a&gt;.

Below is some clarification on the measuring units for the gold reserves since they are shown in metric tons. I&#039;m sure there are some new collectors who should be made aware of the numerous measuring systems. 

1 English (long ton) weighs 2,240 pounds. 1 US (short ton) weighs 2,000 pounds. 

1 Metric ton weighs 2,204.62 pounds. This is 1,000 kilograms. 1 Metric ton contains 32,150.7465686 troy ounces. 

1 metric ton weighs 1000×1000=1,000,000 grams ÷ 31.1034768g (1 troy ounce) = 32,150.7465686 troy ounces in a metric ton.

As a side note, there are 12 troy ounces in a troy pound. A troy pound is 373.2417216 grams.

The&#160;avoirdupois ounce&#160;(28.349523125g) is 1⁄16&#160;avoirdupois pound. It is primarily used in the US. Although the avoirdupois ounce is the mass measure used for most US measurements, the troy ounce (31.1034768g) is used for the mass of&#160;precious metals such as gold, silver, platinum, palladium, rhodium, etc.

You have to be very careful of your measuring units if you&#039;re measuring/buying/selling gold. Grams/kilograms is the best way to be consistent. I hope our federal gatekeepers/statisticians at Fort Knox know the difference when they do their inventory.&#160;&#160;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.coinnews.net/2025/07/18/trump-picks-louisianas-paul-hollis-for-u-s-mint-director/#comment-561996">E 1</a>.</p>
<p>Below is some clarification on the measuring units for the gold reserves since they are shown in metric tons. I&#8217;m sure there are some new collectors who should be made aware of the numerous measuring systems. </p>
<p>1 English (long ton) weighs 2,240 pounds. 1 US (short ton) weighs 2,000 pounds. </p>
<p>1 Metric ton weighs 2,204.62 pounds. This is 1,000 kilograms. 1 Metric ton contains 32,150.7465686 troy ounces. </p>
<p>1 metric ton weighs 1000×1000=1,000,000 grams ÷ 31.1034768g (1 troy ounce) = 32,150.7465686 troy ounces in a metric ton.</p>
<p>As a side note, there are 12 troy ounces in a troy pound. A troy pound is 373.2417216 grams.</p>
<p>The&nbsp;avoirdupois ounce&nbsp;(28.349523125g) is 1⁄16&nbsp;avoirdupois pound. It is primarily used in the US. Although the avoirdupois ounce is the mass measure used for most US measurements, the troy ounce (31.1034768g) is used for the mass of&nbsp;precious metals such as gold, silver, platinum, palladium, rhodium, etc.</p>
<p>You have to be very careful of your measuring units if you&#8217;re measuring/buying/selling gold. Grams/kilograms is the best way to be consistent. I hope our federal gatekeepers/statisticians at Fort Knox know the difference when they do their inventory.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rick		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2025/07/18/trump-picks-louisianas-paul-hollis-for-u-s-mint-director/#comment-562037</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2025 23:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.coinnews.net/?p=110730#comment-562037</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.coinnews.net/2025/07/18/trump-picks-louisianas-paul-hollis-for-u-s-mint-director/#comment-561972&quot;&gt;E 1&lt;/a&gt;.

I like your style here E1, straight to the point, and no messin around!

I&#039;m perfectly fine with that analysis, I&#039;ll take the &#039;64-D as a cross any day.

Maybe the coin grader was a stamp grader at some point. Win some, lose some...
Thanks for the feedback!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.coinnews.net/2025/07/18/trump-picks-louisianas-paul-hollis-for-u-s-mint-director/#comment-561972">E 1</a>.</p>
<p>I like your style here E1, straight to the point, and no messin around!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m perfectly fine with that analysis, I&#8217;ll take the &#8217;64-D as a cross any day.</p>
<p>Maybe the coin grader was a stamp grader at some point. Win some, lose some&#8230;<br />
Thanks for the feedback!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
