<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: New York Precious Metals Exemption Survives, But New Bill Renews Fight	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.coinnews.net/2025/05/19/new-york-precious-metals-exemption-survives-but-new-bill-renews-fight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2025/05/19/new-york-precious-metals-exemption-survives-but-new-bill-renews-fight/</link>
	<description>CoinNews delivers the latest World and US coin news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 May 2025 23:23:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: John Q. Coinage		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2025/05/19/new-york-precious-metals-exemption-survives-but-new-bill-renews-fight/#comment-559427</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Q. Coinage]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2025 23:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.coinnews.net/?p=109760#comment-559427</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.coinnews.net/2025/05/19/new-york-precious-metals-exemption-survives-but-new-bill-renews-fight/#comment-559426&quot;&gt;John Q. Coinage&lt;/a&gt;.

Fuzzy Math
1/10th 0z. AGE]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.coinnews.net/2025/05/19/new-york-precious-metals-exemption-survives-but-new-bill-renews-fight/#comment-559426">John Q. Coinage</a>.</p>
<p>Fuzzy Math<br />
1/10th 0z. AGE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: John Q. Coinage		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2025/05/19/new-york-precious-metals-exemption-survives-but-new-bill-renews-fight/#comment-559426</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Q. Coinage]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2025 23:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.coinnews.net/?p=109760#comment-559426</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.coinnews.net/2025/05/19/new-york-precious-metals-exemption-survives-but-new-bill-renews-fight/#comment-559329&quot;&gt;Rick&lt;/a&gt;.

You got a Plus?   Wow 67s are around especially for 06 and o7 Ps.   Some of the Liberty gold is priced ok when the new $pot price is calculated in, many go for under Greysheet it seems.  $20 Libs and Sts. Pretty strong at these levels.  Hard to imagine soon the 10z AGE will be $400‼️]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.coinnews.net/2025/05/19/new-york-precious-metals-exemption-survives-but-new-bill-renews-fight/#comment-559329">Rick</a>.</p>
<p>You got a Plus?   Wow 67s are around especially for 06 and o7 Ps.   Some of the Liberty gold is priced ok when the new $pot price is calculated in, many go for under Greysheet it seems.  $20 Libs and Sts. Pretty strong at these levels.  Hard to imagine soon the 10z AGE will be $400‼️</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: John Q. Coinage		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2025/05/19/new-york-precious-metals-exemption-survives-but-new-bill-renews-fight/#comment-559425</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Q. Coinage]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2025 23:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.coinnews.net/?p=109760#comment-559425</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.coinnews.net/2025/05/19/new-york-precious-metals-exemption-survives-but-new-bill-renews-fight/#comment-559297&quot;&gt;E 1&lt;/a&gt;.

The restrike was close but even from afar this looks unreal…of course any of the early 20th Century proof US gold is awesome]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.coinnews.net/2025/05/19/new-york-precious-metals-exemption-survives-but-new-bill-renews-fight/#comment-559297">E 1</a>.</p>
<p>The restrike was close but even from afar this looks unreal…of course any of the early 20th Century proof US gold is awesome</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: E 1		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2025/05/19/new-york-precious-metals-exemption-survives-but-new-bill-renews-fight/#comment-559357</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[E 1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2025 02:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.coinnews.net/?p=109760#comment-559357</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.coinnews.net/2025/05/19/new-york-precious-metals-exemption-survives-but-new-bill-renews-fight/#comment-559326&quot;&gt;Rick&lt;/a&gt;.

Rick,

Yes, &quot;Art-Qua-Art&quot; or &quot;Pure Art.&quot; Also meaning Art-As-Art.

The 1907 Proof High Relief Saint Gaudens is truly a masterpiece.

Cheers]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.coinnews.net/2025/05/19/new-york-precious-metals-exemption-survives-but-new-bill-renews-fight/#comment-559326">Rick</a>.</p>
<p>Rick,</p>
<p>Yes, &#8220;Art-Qua-Art&#8221; or &#8220;Pure Art.&#8221; Also meaning Art-As-Art.</p>
<p>The 1907 Proof High Relief Saint Gaudens is truly a masterpiece.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rick		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2025/05/19/new-york-precious-metals-exemption-survives-but-new-bill-renews-fight/#comment-559346</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2025 21:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.coinnews.net/?p=109760#comment-559346</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.coinnews.net/2025/05/19/new-york-precious-metals-exemption-survives-but-new-bill-renews-fight/#comment-559336&quot;&gt;REB&lt;/a&gt;.

I really like those $1 Gold coins, great choice! Scarce, but doable in MS condition. I&#039;d bet that a nice AU awaits(with patience) as well. Keep us posted!
&quot;&lt;span&gt;David Akers (1975/88)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;: A very popular date since this is the first and only San Francisco Mint Type I gold dollar. Reasonably scarce in all grades, but an occasional choice uncirculated example is available.&quot;&lt;/span&gt;
The Princess $1 Gold is an old favorite of mine...Very tempting Mr....]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.coinnews.net/2025/05/19/new-york-precious-metals-exemption-survives-but-new-bill-renews-fight/#comment-559336">REB</a>.</p>
<p>I really like those $1 Gold coins, great choice! Scarce, but doable in MS condition. I&#8217;d bet that a nice AU awaits(with patience) as well. Keep us posted!<br />
&#8220;<span>David Akers (1975/88)</span><span>: A very popular date since this is the first and only San Francisco Mint Type I gold dollar. Reasonably scarce in all grades, but an occasional choice uncirculated example is available.&#8221;</span><br />
The Princess $1 Gold is an old favorite of mine&#8230;Very tempting Mr&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: REB		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2025/05/19/new-york-precious-metals-exemption-survives-but-new-bill-renews-fight/#comment-559336</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[REB]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2025 20:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.coinnews.net/?p=109760#comment-559336</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.coinnews.net/2025/05/19/new-york-precious-metals-exemption-survives-but-new-bill-renews-fight/#comment-559295&quot;&gt;Rick&lt;/a&gt;.

Looks like they almost ran out of space for the mint mark on that 2 1/2.

Now, you can see why my target 1854-S coin is the dollar.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.coinnews.net/2025/05/19/new-york-precious-metals-exemption-survives-but-new-bill-renews-fight/#comment-559295">Rick</a>.</p>
<p>Looks like they almost ran out of space for the mint mark on that 2 1/2.</p>
<p>Now, you can see why my target 1854-S coin is the dollar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: REB		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2025/05/19/new-york-precious-metals-exemption-survives-but-new-bill-renews-fight/#comment-559335</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[REB]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2025 20:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.coinnews.net/?p=109760#comment-559335</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.coinnews.net/2025/05/19/new-york-precious-metals-exemption-survives-but-new-bill-renews-fight/#comment-559293&quot;&gt;CaliSkier&lt;/a&gt;.

Great work and interesting story, Cali.  I guess Mr. du Pont was 1) not the owner of this particular coin, or 2) was paid by someone to back off, and/or 3) both 1 and 2.

Yeah, I meant millions.  Though I do wonder how far a couple of golden Millards would go toward the purchase of a 1854-S half eagle?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.coinnews.net/2025/05/19/new-york-precious-metals-exemption-survives-but-new-bill-renews-fight/#comment-559293">CaliSkier</a>.</p>
<p>Great work and interesting story, Cali.  I guess Mr. du Pont was 1) not the owner of this particular coin, or 2) was paid by someone to back off, and/or 3) both 1 and 2.</p>
<p>Yeah, I meant millions.  Though I do wonder how far a couple of golden Millards would go toward the purchase of a 1854-S half eagle?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rick		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2025/05/19/new-york-precious-metals-exemption-survives-but-new-bill-renews-fight/#comment-559329</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2025 19:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.coinnews.net/?p=109760#comment-559329</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.coinnews.net/2025/05/19/new-york-precious-metals-exemption-survives-but-new-bill-renews-fight/#comment-559327&quot;&gt;Rick&lt;/a&gt;.

And the BU/MS coins? Well that&#039;s interesting too.
They often use the term &quot;Choice Brilliant Uncirculated&quot; to describe the MS coins, that&#039;s it. So, it seems (subjectively) that an MS60 coin is grouped with an MS70 coin with an estimate of $150 - $200 for the $2.5 coins (I prefer that description over &#039;&lt;span&gt;Quarter Eagle&#039;, just me). So, in 1974 my &quot;Choice BU&quot; 1906 Liberty $2.5 was worth $150 -$200? My, have times changed...&lt;/span&gt;
https://www.pcgs.com/cert/47335863]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.coinnews.net/2025/05/19/new-york-precious-metals-exemption-survives-but-new-bill-renews-fight/#comment-559327">Rick</a>.</p>
<p>And the BU/MS coins? Well that&#8217;s interesting too.<br />
They often use the term &#8220;Choice Brilliant Uncirculated&#8221; to describe the MS coins, that&#8217;s it. So, it seems (subjectively) that an MS60 coin is grouped with an MS70 coin with an estimate of $150 &#8211; $200 for the $2.5 coins (I prefer that description over &#8216;<span>Quarter Eagle&#8217;, just me). So, in 1974 my &#8220;Choice BU&#8221; 1906 Liberty $2.5 was worth $150 -$200? My, have times changed&#8230;</span><br />
<a href="https://www.pcgs.com/cert/47335863" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.pcgs.com/cert/47335863</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: John Q. Coinage		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2025/05/19/new-york-precious-metals-exemption-survives-but-new-bill-renews-fight/#comment-559328</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Q. Coinage]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2025 19:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.coinnews.net/?p=109760#comment-559328</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.coinnews.net/2025/05/19/new-york-precious-metals-exemption-survives-but-new-bill-renews-fight/#comment-559293&quot;&gt;CaliSkier&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks Cali, the coin is a monster!   There may still be more….somewhere…..
wonder what a 1/2z Sacagawea will be offered as, 5m close out…..AMPEx special]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.coinnews.net/2025/05/19/new-york-precious-metals-exemption-survives-but-new-bill-renews-fight/#comment-559293">CaliSkier</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks Cali, the coin is a monster!   There may still be more….somewhere…..<br />
wonder what a 1/2z Sacagawea will be offered as, 5m close out…..AMPEx special</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rick		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2025/05/19/new-york-precious-metals-exemption-survives-but-new-bill-renews-fight/#comment-559327</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2025 19:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.coinnews.net/?p=109760#comment-559327</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.coinnews.net/2025/05/19/new-york-precious-metals-exemption-survives-but-new-bill-renews-fight/#comment-559306&quot;&gt;CaliSkier&lt;/a&gt;.

Well, much of that went over my head, but I appreciate the research no doubt Cali. Speaking of which, the Newman Numismatic Portal is the Bomb when it comes to research. In looking at that 1974 Rio Rancho Auction, it&#039;s interesting to see the grading standards of the time, ie; no numerical grading. The many gradations of &quot;Fine&quot;, to the many &quot;AU&quot; descriptors help to tell a story on the coins condition.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.coinnews.net/2025/05/19/new-york-precious-metals-exemption-survives-but-new-bill-renews-fight/#comment-559306">CaliSkier</a>.</p>
<p>Well, much of that went over my head, but I appreciate the research no doubt Cali. Speaking of which, the Newman Numismatic Portal is the Bomb when it comes to research. In looking at that 1974 Rio Rancho Auction, it&#8217;s interesting to see the grading standards of the time, ie; no numerical grading. The many gradations of &#8220;Fine&#8221;, to the many &#8220;AU&#8221; descriptors help to tell a story on the coins condition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
