<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Gold Rises Slightly on Thursday, June 15	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.coinnews.net/2023/06/15/gold-rises-slightly-on-thursday-june-15/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2023/06/15/gold-rises-slightly-on-thursday-june-15/</link>
	<description>CoinNews delivers the latest World and US coin news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2023 14:06:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: CaliSkier		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2023/06/15/gold-rises-slightly-on-thursday-june-15/#comment-522879</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CaliSkier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2023 14:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.coinnews.net/?p=96772#comment-522879</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.coinnews.net/2023/06/15/gold-rises-slightly-on-thursday-june-15/#comment-522868&quot;&gt;Antonio&lt;/a&gt;.

Antonio, Kaiser Wilhelm, et al. Careful, if shopping or buying the 2023 Extra V Lincoln Cemt. Although, currently being attributed and slabbed, the verdict still hasn’t been completely agreed upon apparently, as to how or where these coins picked up that extra V? I’ve heard this evening on BlueRidge SilverHounds June 14 Market Report, there is now speculation this could be an “ejection mark”? He mentions this and that if so, this is damage or a mark created, after leaving the Mint. All I’m saying, is if these turn out to not be errors, per se, I’d imagine there would be quite a few buyers that paid top dollar that may have some serious buyers remorse? Guess we’ll see how this latest information pans out?

PS Extra V ‘s are being reported in other places on the obverse as well]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.coinnews.net/2023/06/15/gold-rises-slightly-on-thursday-june-15/#comment-522868">Antonio</a>.</p>
<p>Antonio, Kaiser Wilhelm, et al. Careful, if shopping or buying the 2023 Extra V Lincoln Cemt. Although, currently being attributed and slabbed, the verdict still hasn’t been completely agreed upon apparently, as to how or where these coins picked up that extra V? I’ve heard this evening on BlueRidge SilverHounds June 14 Market Report, there is now speculation this could be an “ejection mark”? He mentions this and that if so, this is damage or a mark created, after leaving the Mint. All I’m saying, is if these turn out to not be errors, per se, I’d imagine there would be quite a few buyers that paid top dollar that may have some serious buyers remorse? Guess we’ll see how this latest information pans out?</p>
<p>PS Extra V ‘s are being reported in other places on the obverse as well</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Antonio		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2023/06/15/gold-rises-slightly-on-thursday-june-15/#comment-522868</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Antonio]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2023 23:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.coinnews.net/?p=96772#comment-522868</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Anything about a &quot;v&quot; cent?  I don&#039;t see anything about those.  Oh, gold, yeah, right.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anything about a &#8220;v&#8221; cent?  I don&#8217;t see anything about those.  Oh, gold, yeah, right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
