<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: PCGS Encapsulates Legendary 1933 Saint-Gaudens Double Eagle	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.coinnews.net/2021/07/28/pcgs-encapsulates-legendary-1933-saint-gaudens-double-eagle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2021/07/28/pcgs-encapsulates-legendary-1933-saint-gaudens-double-eagle/</link>
	<description>CoinNews delivers the latest World and US coin news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2021 03:38:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Big T		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2021/07/28/pcgs-encapsulates-legendary-1933-saint-gaudens-double-eagle/#comment-495377</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Big T]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2021 03:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.coinnews.net/?p=80387#comment-495377</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.coinnews.net/2021/07/28/pcgs-encapsulates-legendary-1933-saint-gaudens-double-eagle/#comment-494786&quot;&gt;Seth Riesling&lt;/a&gt;.

hard to tell from the pics - but I can&#039;t see how, at least for this date, it would matter if it was a 62 or a 65 - it&#039;s worth so much over reality it doesn&#039;t matter imo. 
It is worth millions either way...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.coinnews.net/2021/07/28/pcgs-encapsulates-legendary-1933-saint-gaudens-double-eagle/#comment-494786">Seth Riesling</a>.</p>
<p>hard to tell from the pics &#8211; but I can&#8217;t see how, at least for this date, it would matter if it was a 62 or a 65 &#8211; it&#8217;s worth so much over reality it doesn&#8217;t matter imo.<br />
It is worth millions either way&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Seth Riesling		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2021/07/28/pcgs-encapsulates-legendary-1933-saint-gaudens-double-eagle/#comment-494786</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Seth Riesling]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2021 23:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.coinnews.net/?p=80387#comment-494786</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This is NOT a MS-65 coin! I have seen many of these coins with other dates on PCGS MS-64 with less marks. Look at the major gouges all over her left leg! Ouch!! King Farouk loved cleaning some of his coins with a toothbrush as the story goes...PCGS knew who bought this coin &#038; the dealer who helped him &#038; they guaranteed them a 65 grade. Notice that NGC did not give it a pre-sale grade publicly, because it&#039;s a 64 in reality. 

 NumisdudeTX]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is NOT a MS-65 coin! I have seen many of these coins with other dates on PCGS MS-64 with less marks. Look at the major gouges all over her left leg! Ouch!! King Farouk loved cleaning some of his coins with a toothbrush as the story goes&#8230;PCGS knew who bought this coin &amp; the dealer who helped him &amp; they guaranteed them a 65 grade. Notice that NGC did not give it a pre-sale grade publicly, because it&#8217;s a 64 in reality. </p>
<p> NumisdudeTX</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
