<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: CCAC to Review First of the American Women Quarter Designs	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.coinnews.net/2021/04/02/ccac-to-review-first-of-the-american-women-quarter-designs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2021/04/02/ccac-to-review-first-of-the-american-women-quarter-designs/</link>
	<description>CoinNews delivers the latest World and US coin news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2021 14:00:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Vachon		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2021/04/02/ccac-to-review-first-of-the-american-women-quarter-designs/#comment-491538</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vachon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2021 14:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.coinnews.net/?p=78111#comment-491538</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.coinnews.net/2021/04/02/ccac-to-review-first-of-the-american-women-quarter-designs/#comment-491508&quot;&gt;Vachon&lt;/a&gt;.

I mean, honestly it&#039;s pretty stupid to not put the woman being honored on the obverse of the coin and that something relevant to her reason for being on the coin to begin with on the reverse.

I guess they&#039;re all Washington&#039;s mistresses now?

I love how nobody in Congress thinks through their decisions before forcing the Mint to execute them

I also find it funny because it&#039;s not like Washington isn&#039;t also on the dollar and that there aren&#039;t over 100 billion Washington quarters currently in existence. Like, they&#039;re not going away if you boot him for a couple of years (or forever) but frightened Congressmen will never allow this.

It&#039;s probably why we still have cents, nickels, and dimes despite their lack of purchasing power. If they were images of Liberty, those denominations would&#039;ve been jettisoned decades ago (even the quarter-dollar is on shaky inflationary ground now) but because we don&#039;t, the Mint will still being striking Lincoln cents for circulation into the 22nd century :-)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.coinnews.net/2021/04/02/ccac-to-review-first-of-the-american-women-quarter-designs/#comment-491508">Vachon</a>.</p>
<p>I mean, honestly it&#8217;s pretty stupid to not put the woman being honored on the obverse of the coin and that something relevant to her reason for being on the coin to begin with on the reverse.</p>
<p>I guess they&#8217;re all Washington&#8217;s mistresses now?</p>
<p>I love how nobody in Congress thinks through their decisions before forcing the Mint to execute them</p>
<p>I also find it funny because it&#8217;s not like Washington isn&#8217;t also on the dollar and that there aren&#8217;t over 100 billion Washington quarters currently in existence. Like, they&#8217;re not going away if you boot him for a couple of years (or forever) but frightened Congressmen will never allow this.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s probably why we still have cents, nickels, and dimes despite their lack of purchasing power. If they were images of Liberty, those denominations would&#8217;ve been jettisoned decades ago (even the quarter-dollar is on shaky inflationary ground now) but because we don&#8217;t, the Mint will still being striking Lincoln cents for circulation into the 22nd century 🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: raphael		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2021/04/02/ccac-to-review-first-of-the-american-women-quarter-designs/#comment-491529</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[raphael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2021 21:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.coinnews.net/?p=78111#comment-491529</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Did notice the Mint took off all Reverse Proof Innovation Dollars of their 2021 Product Schedule that had a date &quot;TBD&quot; no explanation given which is the norm for the mint. Wonder if they are going to stop making them or thinking of design changes. Or also possible is they may be striking them in 2022, because the San Francisco mint is going to be busy in 2021 ??????]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did notice the Mint took off all Reverse Proof Innovation Dollars of their 2021 Product Schedule that had a date &#8220;TBD&#8221; no explanation given which is the norm for the mint. Wonder if they are going to stop making them or thinking of design changes. Or also possible is they may be striking them in 2022, because the San Francisco mint is going to be busy in 2021 ??????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Vachon		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2021/04/02/ccac-to-review-first-of-the-american-women-quarter-designs/#comment-491508</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vachon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2021 13:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.coinnews.net/?p=78111#comment-491508</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Wait, for real? I thought we were done with circulating commemoratives for our lifetimes? I was really looking forward to a return to normalcy after 22 years of ever-changing designs (half the coin anyway because God forbid we eject any one of our dead Presidents line-up). I&#039;m tired of all these questionable programs. Pick something and stick with it for 25+ years already!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait, for real? I thought we were done with circulating commemoratives for our lifetimes? I was really looking forward to a return to normalcy after 22 years of ever-changing designs (half the coin anyway because God forbid we eject any one of our dead Presidents line-up). I&#8217;m tired of all these questionable programs. Pick something and stick with it for 25+ years already!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mike Unser		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2021/04/02/ccac-to-review-first-of-the-american-women-quarter-designs/#comment-491496</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Unser]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2021 19:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.coinnews.net/?p=78111#comment-491496</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Kaiser, thanks much. I&#039;ve corrected the article to show four hours instead of the five it had.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kaiser, thanks much. I&#8217;ve corrected the article to show four hours instead of the five it had.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ignacio		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2021/04/02/ccac-to-review-first-of-the-american-women-quarter-designs/#comment-491494</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ignacio]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2021 16:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.coinnews.net/?p=78111#comment-491494</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It would be very cool to have a coin series about endangered animals and plants too]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be very cool to have a coin series about endangered animals and plants too</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
