<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Rare 1943 Lincoln Cent Sells Above Estimate Contrary to Reports	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.coinnews.net/2019/01/17/rare-1943-lincoln-cent-sells-above-estimate-contrary-to-reports/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2019/01/17/rare-1943-lincoln-cent-sells-above-estimate-contrary-to-reports/</link>
	<description>CoinNews delivers the latest World and US coin news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2019 23:44:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Munzen		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2019/01/17/rare-1943-lincoln-cent-sells-above-estimate-contrary-to-reports/#comment-431500</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Munzen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2019 23:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=70303#comment-431500</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.coinnews.net/2019/01/17/rare-1943-lincoln-cent-sells-above-estimate-contrary-to-reports/#comment-430377&quot;&gt;Millhouse&lt;/a&gt;.

Minor correction: &quot;steelies&quot; were plated with zinc rather than nickel, which was also a strategic metal. 

The zinc plating proved to be unsatisfactory because it quickly wore off in spots, allowing the underlying steel to rust; the rest of it reacted with moisture, skin oils, etc. and turned an ugly gray. The gray color also led many people to erroneously believe the coins were struck in lead, a misunderstanding that persists even today.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.coinnews.net/2019/01/17/rare-1943-lincoln-cent-sells-above-estimate-contrary-to-reports/#comment-430377">Millhouse</a>.</p>
<p>Minor correction: &#8220;steelies&#8221; were plated with zinc rather than nickel, which was also a strategic metal. </p>
<p>The zinc plating proved to be unsatisfactory because it quickly wore off in spots, allowing the underlying steel to rust; the rest of it reacted with moisture, skin oils, etc. and turned an ugly gray. The gray color also led many people to erroneously believe the coins were struck in lead, a misunderstanding that persists even today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2019/01/17/rare-1943-lincoln-cent-sells-above-estimate-contrary-to-reports/#comment-430698</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2019 23:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=70303#comment-430698</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.coinnews.net/2019/01/17/rare-1943-lincoln-cent-sells-above-estimate-contrary-to-reports/#comment-430245&quot;&gt;Margie Hill&lt;/a&gt;.

erv is right.  These are a very famous error, though as the link says the regular (steel) 1943s are of very low value.  Incidentally, the mint went back to copper in 1944, but a few steel cents were made in error.  While rare, they don&#039;t have the cachet of the &#039;43 coppers.  Anyway, interesting material though the chance of finding any in circulation is zero.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.coinnews.net/2019/01/17/rare-1943-lincoln-cent-sells-above-estimate-contrary-to-reports/#comment-430245">Margie Hill</a>.</p>
<p>erv is right.  These are a very famous error, though as the link says the regular (steel) 1943s are of very low value.  Incidentally, the mint went back to copper in 1944, but a few steel cents were made in error.  While rare, they don&#8217;t have the cachet of the &#8217;43 coppers.  Anyway, interesting material though the chance of finding any in circulation is zero.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: erv		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2019/01/17/rare-1943-lincoln-cent-sells-above-estimate-contrary-to-reports/#comment-430382</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[erv]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2019 21:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=70303#comment-430382</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.coinnews.net/2019/01/17/rare-1943-lincoln-cent-sells-above-estimate-contrary-to-reports/#comment-430245&quot;&gt;Margie Hill&lt;/a&gt;.

It is rare as the 1943 penny was struck in steel due to the war resulting in a shortage of copper.  A few were struck in bronze.  www.pcgs.com/coinfacts/category/half-cents/lincoln-cent-wheat-reverse/type-2-steel-1943/1613]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.coinnews.net/2019/01/17/rare-1943-lincoln-cent-sells-above-estimate-contrary-to-reports/#comment-430245">Margie Hill</a>.</p>
<p>It is rare as the 1943 penny was struck in steel due to the war resulting in a shortage of copper.  A few were struck in bronze.  <a href="http://www.pcgs.com/coinfacts/category/half-cents/lincoln-cent-wheat-reverse/type-2-steel-1943/1613" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.pcgs.com/coinfacts/category/half-cents/lincoln-cent-wheat-reverse/type-2-steel-1943/1613</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Millhouse		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2019/01/17/rare-1943-lincoln-cent-sells-above-estimate-contrary-to-reports/#comment-430377</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Millhouse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2019 21:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=70303#comment-430377</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.coinnews.net/2019/01/17/rare-1943-lincoln-cent-sells-above-estimate-contrary-to-reports/#comment-430245&quot;&gt;Margie Hill&lt;/a&gt;.

1943 pennies were never supposed to be made with copper planchets. They were all supposed to be made of nickel plated steel, to conserve copper for the war effort. A very small number of copper pennies were minted by mistake and that is why they are so special and rare. The steel pennies are not worth the metal with which they were minted, but the copper ones are worth a small fortune.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.coinnews.net/2019/01/17/rare-1943-lincoln-cent-sells-above-estimate-contrary-to-reports/#comment-430245">Margie Hill</a>.</p>
<p>1943 pennies were never supposed to be made with copper planchets. They were all supposed to be made of nickel plated steel, to conserve copper for the war effort. A very small number of copper pennies were minted by mistake and that is why they are so special and rare. The steel pennies are not worth the metal with which they were minted, but the copper ones are worth a small fortune.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Margie Hill		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2019/01/17/rare-1943-lincoln-cent-sells-above-estimate-contrary-to-reports/#comment-430245</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Margie Hill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2019 03:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=70303#comment-430245</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I want to know what is so special about a 1943 penny?  Why is it rare?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to know what is so special about a 1943 penny?  Why is it rare?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
