<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 1792 Washington Gold Eagle Realizes $1.74 Million in Heritage Philadelphia Sale	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.coinnews.net/2018/08/17/1792-washington-gold-eagle-realizes-1-74-million-in-heritage-philadelphia-sale/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2018/08/17/1792-washington-gold-eagle-realizes-1-74-million-in-heritage-philadelphia-sale/</link>
	<description>CoinNews delivers the latest World and US coin news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2018 22:33:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2018/08/17/1792-washington-gold-eagle-realizes-1-74-million-in-heritage-philadelphia-sale/#comment-349292</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2018 22:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=68504#comment-349292</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The article linked here is interesting, because there were a lot of Washington tokens issued in Britain around this time (see &quot;The Red Book&quot; for a whole section).  Whether it was an actual pattern from the US Mint may be debatable, but it certainly is an interesting piece.  Washington apparently did refuse to be on the coinage--no actual person appeared until the commemorative Columbian half of 1892--so who knows?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article linked here is interesting, because there were a lot of Washington tokens issued in Britain around this time (see &#8220;The Red Book&#8221; for a whole section).  Whether it was an actual pattern from the US Mint may be debatable, but it certainly is an interesting piece.  Washington apparently did refuse to be on the coinage&#8211;no actual person appeared until the commemorative Columbian half of 1892&#8211;so who knows?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
