<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 2016 Proof Set from San Francisco Mint Released	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.coinnews.net/2016/04/01/proof-set-from-san-francisco-mint/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2016/04/01/proof-set-from-san-francisco-mint/</link>
	<description>CoinNews delivers the latest World and US coin news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 May 2016 02:42:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: John		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2016/04/01/proof-set-from-san-francisco-mint/#comment-164427</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2016 02:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=57359#comment-164427</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I started after I got way -said to myself shit I have no thing for kids so I bought mostly 2015 silver and clad sets-looked at e-bay 85 pages of same needless to say we paid bill and cut the mint loose I tried as a dad...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I started after I got way -said to myself shit I have no thing for kids so I bought mostly 2015 silver and clad sets-looked at e-bay 85 pages of same needless to say we paid bill and cut the mint loose I tried as a dad&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: jim		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2016/04/01/proof-set-from-san-francisco-mint/#comment-159278</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2016 04:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=57359#comment-159278</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You gotta admit they haven&#039;t changed their across the board doesn&#039;t matter where to or how much product either value or quantity S&#038;H since 2004.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You gotta admit they haven&#8217;t changed their across the board doesn&#8217;t matter where to or how much product either value or quantity S&amp;H since 2004.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: jerryinjersey		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2016/04/01/proof-set-from-san-francisco-mint/#comment-159140</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jerryinjersey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2016 13:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=57359#comment-159140</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The U.S. Mint screwed me with their shipping charges last year. After being a customer of the mint for fifty years, I will no longer buy ANY U.S. Mint products at all. Believe me, they will lose far more in profits than if they had acknowledged their error and refunded my overcharge.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. Mint screwed me with their shipping charges last year. After being a customer of the mint for fifty years, I will no longer buy ANY U.S. Mint products at all. Believe me, they will lose far more in profits than if they had acknowledged their error and refunded my overcharge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Christopher Williams		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2016/04/01/proof-set-from-san-francisco-mint/#comment-159091</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christopher Williams]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2016 00:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=57359#comment-159091</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@Seth--

+1]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Seth&#8211;</p>
<p>+1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Seth Riesling		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2016/04/01/proof-set-from-san-francisco-mint/#comment-159075</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Seth Riesling]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2016 21:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=57359#comment-159075</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Darrin Lee Unser -

Minor typo, second to last paragraph has date as 2015.  

It is sad that the e-mail from the U.S. Mint on this product calls the Lincoln cent a &quot;penny.&quot; And worse, on the packaging under the Lincoln cent photo it states &quot;penny&quot; also. So much for proper numismatic terminology for beginners!

-NumisDudeTX]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darrin Lee Unser &#8211;</p>
<p>Minor typo, second to last paragraph has date as 2015.  </p>
<p>It is sad that the e-mail from the U.S. Mint on this product calls the Lincoln cent a &#8220;penny.&#8221; And worse, on the packaging under the Lincoln cent photo it states &#8220;penny&#8221; also. So much for proper numismatic terminology for beginners!</p>
<p>-NumisDudeTX</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
