<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 2015 Coin in Some Canadian 2016 Uncirculated Sets	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.coinnews.net/2016/01/29/2015-coin-in-some-canadian-2016-uncirculated-sets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2016/01/29/2015-coin-in-some-canadian-2016-uncirculated-sets/</link>
	<description>CoinNews delivers the latest World and US coin news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2016 00:22:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Frankie G.		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2016/01/29/2015-coin-in-some-canadian-2016-uncirculated-sets/#comment-179338</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frankie G.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2016 00:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=56334#comment-179338</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Someone answer me this. I&#039;m looking to buy the 2016 Canada unc set. I&#039;ve seen one where the date 2016 is on the reverse under the loon. Then another I&#039;ve seen the 2016 is under the Queen. What&#039;s that all about ? Why 2 different loonies ? Anybody please let me know if anyone knows. Thanks.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone answer me this. I&#8217;m looking to buy the 2016 Canada unc set. I&#8217;ve seen one where the date 2016 is on the reverse under the loon. Then another I&#8217;ve seen the 2016 is under the Queen. What&#8217;s that all about ? Why 2 different loonies ? Anybody please let me know if anyone knows. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ken		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2016/01/29/2015-coin-in-some-canadian-2016-uncirculated-sets/#comment-152559</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ken]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2016 17:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=56334#comment-152559</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I have one too.  Number 17108 / 60000]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have one too.  Number 17108 / 60000</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Seth Riesling		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2016/01/29/2015-coin-in-some-canadian-2016-uncirculated-sets/#comment-152504</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Seth Riesling]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2016 03:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=56334#comment-152504</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Jp -

You are right about this set. The RCM lowered the mintage of last year&#039;s set from 80,000 to 60,000 &#038; still didnt sell out at only $24.95 Canadian dollars (about $19.00 U.S. dollars) &#038; they are even serially numbered on the folder with the specifications! This year&#039;s set is the same mintage &#038; price &#038; they are pushing it hard in advertising everywhere, but with low sales so far (it is a new year product though so maybe they will sell out in a few months!l)  The packaging error is probably just a publicity stunt to increase sales &#038; I wouldn&#039;t recommend paying too much extra for a packaging error.  It is a nice looking set though.  

Happy Collecting everyone!

-NumisDudeTX]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jp &#8211;</p>
<p>You are right about this set. The RCM lowered the mintage of last year&#8217;s set from 80,000 to 60,000 &amp; still didnt sell out at only $24.95 Canadian dollars (about $19.00 U.S. dollars) &amp; they are even serially numbered on the folder with the specifications! This year&#8217;s set is the same mintage &amp; price &amp; they are pushing it hard in advertising everywhere, but with low sales so far (it is a new year product though so maybe they will sell out in a few months!l)  The packaging error is probably just a publicity stunt to increase sales &amp; I wouldn&#8217;t recommend paying too much extra for a packaging error.  It is a nice looking set though.  </p>
<p>Happy Collecting everyone!</p>
<p>-NumisDudeTX</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jp		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2016/01/29/2015-coin-in-some-canadian-2016-uncirculated-sets/#comment-152493</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jp]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2016 01:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=56334#comment-152493</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think sales must have been S-L-O-W on this set. It needed a little coin motivation from the enthusiasts. I&#039;ll pass.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think sales must have been S-L-O-W on this set. It needed a little coin motivation from the enthusiasts. I&#8217;ll pass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jack		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2016/01/29/2015-coin-in-some-canadian-2016-uncirculated-sets/#comment-152467</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2016 20:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=56334#comment-152467</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[One already bid up to $72.....lol
http://www.ebay.com/itm/ERROR-2016-UNCIRCULATED-COIN-SET-Royal-Canadian-Mint-2015-Loonie-CANADA-/141882941062?hash=item2108e1de86:g:IKIAAOSwL7VWoFgt]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One already bid up to $72&#8230;..lol<br />
<a href="http://www.ebay.com/itm/ERROR-2016-UNCIRCULATED-COIN-SET-Royal-Canadian-Mint-2015-Loonie-CANADA-/141882941062?hash=item2108e1de86:g:IKIAAOSwL7VWoFgt" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.ebay.com/itm/ERROR-2016-UNCIRCULATED-COIN-SET-Royal-Canadian-Mint-2015-Loonie-CANADA-/141882941062?hash=item2108e1de86:g:IKIAAOSwL7VWoFgt</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Brian		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2016/01/29/2015-coin-in-some-canadian-2016-uncirculated-sets/#comment-152465</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2016 20:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=56334#comment-152465</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I agree with Eric]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Eric</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: eric		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2016/01/29/2015-coin-in-some-canadian-2016-uncirculated-sets/#comment-152452</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[eric]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2016 16:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=56334#comment-152452</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Why would anyone return that? Wouldn&#039;t that be considered a mint error? Not a coin error, but an error none the less.... I wouldn&#039;t return it, and I&#039;d just order another if I had to have it....]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would anyone return that? Wouldn&#8217;t that be considered a mint error? Not a coin error, but an error none the less&#8230;. I wouldn&#8217;t return it, and I&#8217;d just order another if I had to have it&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
