<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 2015 March of Dimes Special Silver Set Sells Out	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.coinnews.net/2015/08/07/2015-march-of-dimes-special-silver-set-sells-out/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2015/08/07/2015-march-of-dimes-special-silver-set-sells-out/</link>
	<description>CoinNews delivers the latest World and US coin news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2015 19:36:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Dominic		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2015/08/07/2015-march-of-dimes-special-silver-set-sells-out/#comment-136601</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dominic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2015 19:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=53410#comment-136601</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Not to change topics, but...
We rec&#039;d 4 2015 Liberty Golds. The rim nicks were apparent on one under 30x loupe. Sent it back. Another had nicking under the torch, again under 30x. That&#039;s going back too. That leaves us with 2. It&#039;s a beautiful coin - a fresh approach instead of recycling the old classics. I&#039;ve heard that there one of the TPG&#039;s has MS, and also proof-like and mirror Proof-like varieties. We&#039;ll see how that turns out. As far as packing, I&#039;d rather have more coin, less package. The Jackie&#039;s came in beautiful presentation cases but sent them to PCGS, so now what do I do with those beautiful cases now? Lol. I wouldn&#039;t dream of leaving these pieces out to display in these cases anyway, let alone having seen anyone display them that way. Except the dealers in their glass cases of course!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to change topics, but&#8230;<br />
We rec&#8217;d 4 2015 Liberty Golds. The rim nicks were apparent on one under 30x loupe. Sent it back. Another had nicking under the torch, again under 30x. That&#8217;s going back too. That leaves us with 2. It&#8217;s a beautiful coin &#8211; a fresh approach instead of recycling the old classics. I&#8217;ve heard that there one of the TPG&#8217;s has MS, and also proof-like and mirror Proof-like varieties. We&#8217;ll see how that turns out. As far as packing, I&#8217;d rather have more coin, less package. The Jackie&#8217;s came in beautiful presentation cases but sent them to PCGS, so now what do I do with those beautiful cases now? Lol. I wouldn&#8217;t dream of leaving these pieces out to display in these cases anyway, let alone having seen anyone display them that way. Except the dealers in their glass cases of course!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tinto		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2015/08/07/2015-march-of-dimes-special-silver-set-sells-out/#comment-136437</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tinto]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2015 17:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=53410#comment-136437</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Glad I skipped this HR gold .. did the Mint ever say exactly how they produced this coin?  Was it given for example, a satin finish and stuff like that beyond the high relief strike ...  ?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad I skipped this HR gold .. did the Mint ever say exactly how they produced this coin?  Was it given for example, a satin finish and stuff like that beyond the high relief strike &#8230;  ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Boz		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2015/08/07/2015-march-of-dimes-special-silver-set-sells-out/#comment-136373</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Boz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2015 23:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=53410#comment-136373</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I meant to say the dime guys were bored to tears after decades of special quarters and dollar coins. Finally something to get fired up about.

And I wish the spell checkers would quit changing my words. 

That is my ten cents worth anyhow!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant to say the dime guys were bored to tears after decades of special quarters and dollar coins. Finally something to get fired up about.</p>
<p>And I wish the spell checkers would quit changing my words. </p>
<p>That is my ten cents worth anyhow!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Stuart		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2015/08/07/2015-march-of-dimes-special-silver-set-sells-out/#comment-136361</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stuart]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2015 20:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=53410#comment-136361</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Just received the 2015 American Liberty High Relief piece earlier in the week; although it was struck as a successor more or less to the 2009 UHR, the Mint did not execute this new product as perfectly as they did in &#039;09. Back then, they spared no expense with a mahogany presentation box with a small booklet. This year, the Mint cut a number of corners; especially, giving it a presentation case that was fitting for a proof commemorative and not a high relief. No additional booklet either. I noticed a couple of rim nicks on the reverse, almost like it was scraped during production. And, business strike finish made the piece appear as a circulating quality coin similar to what would be found in change just freshly struck. However, all the devices on both obverse and reverse were sharply executed especially the flying eagle. I believe it&#039;s the best looking eagle I&#039;ve seen on any U. S. Mint coin. As it stands, the coin was sold $400 above and beyond melt value given the $100 face value.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just received the 2015 American Liberty High Relief piece earlier in the week; although it was struck as a successor more or less to the 2009 UHR, the Mint did not execute this new product as perfectly as they did in &#8217;09. Back then, they spared no expense with a mahogany presentation box with a small booklet. This year, the Mint cut a number of corners; especially, giving it a presentation case that was fitting for a proof commemorative and not a high relief. No additional booklet either. I noticed a couple of rim nicks on the reverse, almost like it was scraped during production. And, business strike finish made the piece appear as a circulating quality coin similar to what would be found in change just freshly struck. However, all the devices on both obverse and reverse were sharply executed especially the flying eagle. I believe it&#8217;s the best looking eagle I&#8217;ve seen on any U. S. Mint coin. As it stands, the coin was sold $400 above and beyond melt value given the $100 face value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Danny Morano		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2015/08/07/2015-march-of-dimes-special-silver-set-sells-out/#comment-136359</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny Morano]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2015 20:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=53410#comment-136359</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Just got my Jackie Kennedy Proof. Beautiful, glad I bought it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just got my Jackie Kennedy Proof. Beautiful, glad I bought it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Boz		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2015/08/07/2015-march-of-dimes-special-silver-set-sells-out/#comment-136358</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Boz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2015 20:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=53410#comment-136358</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This was without a doubt the best offering of the year. A real gift to dime collectors who were about after years of quarters and dollar coins.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was without a doubt the best offering of the year. A real gift to dime collectors who were about after years of quarters and dollar coins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
