Comments on: 2015 $100 American Liberty High Relief Gold Coin Photos

By: Rooster

Rooster — Sat, 14 Aug 2021 03:36:20 +0000

In reply to Stephen Miller. Probably but what if it’s not? Have you found out?

By: Stephen Miller

Stephen Miller — Wed, 28 Jul 2021 15:19:44 +0000

I have 2015 relief W but it doesn’t say 9999 fine gold on the backside,it it fake? Can I get anything four it?

By: John

John — Wed, 27 Jul 2016 17:34:52 +0000

I reviewed the reverse and found the same rim problems as described, a lot of hair line scratches in the obverse as well. In the end I submitted the coin to PCGS and received an MS70.

By: Nels

Nels — Sun, 15 May 2016 01:51:09 +0000

Any new news on HR gold coin? What a mess about finding Lint, hair, scratches and a blob of something unknown. I’m thinking about stop looking. I never seen anything like this with “Canadian coins” Come on USA MINT

By: jim

jim — Thu, 12 May 2016 03:57:57 +0000

In reply to peteforliberty.

I doubt it; the platinum eagle is set at $100. It’s possible that they’ll come up with a new coin in platinum maybe as part of the liberty series and since the liberty gold has twice the value of a gold eagle the platinum liberty could be set at $200.

Doesn’t really matter since they sell at the going rate for the metal but who knows? As long as Jeppson is “in charge” anything can happen.

By: peteforliberty

peteforliberty — Wed, 11 May 2016 02:37:03 +0000

I just purchased the 2015 American Liberty HR gold $100. from my local coin shop, NGC slabbed and graded MS69, early release. NO nicks, scratches or otherwise as you would expect from a direct mint issued or in this case, certified coin.
I like the smaller and thicker format as opposed to a standard bullion coin. Liberty
herself appears a bit frail, but the reverse eagle has bold detail which almost makes the coin by itself. And four nines doesn’t hurt either- What will come next- a $200.00 platinum eagle?

By: jim

jim — Mon, 18 Jan 2016 17:37:39 +0000

The last several years the schedule has been full of TBDs. These temporary bureaucrats are just place holders for when a real director takes over so they don’t try to manage the mint, they’re just there to keep it running. I don’t think they have either the skill or the guts to make anything happen. The last time a full schedule (no or very few TBDs) was when the mint had it’s last director – Edwin Moy, who quit Jan 2011.

I read that Obama’s thinking about putting Jeppson up for permanent director. Based on his performance so far, a big mistake in my opinion.

By: TJ

TJ — Mon, 18 Jan 2016 15:51:04 +0000

In reply to Nels. On a related note, as it pertains to mint operation in general. Why are there so many TBD dates in the 2016 schedule? As we have talked about in the past, some of us have to budget to get the coins we want. I subscribe to most of the popular ones and most of those i.e.: Eagles, proof sets, limited edition and uncirculated sets are in TBD status. Is the mint director that bad that they can't even offer a full schedule for the year and stick to it? I know the law was changed late last year to make the Eagles with a plain edge but that covers one coin. Let's get the rookie out of there and get a professional director. Maybe in January of next year.

By: Nels

Nels — Mon, 18 Jan 2016 06:18:13 +0000

How can we find out how many coins were sent back and what happened to them? Is it possible for the returned coins to have been reworked and sent back out or just sent back out? I sent a total of 3 back in to them and I’m sure many other people did the same! This has to be the worst ever in the history of the mint sending so many scratched coins out to the public. Don’t they have people watching for messed up coins? I would really like to find out what went wrong and why weren’t they melted down and nice ones sent out? Was Quality control not doing there job?

By: Albert H Stillman

Albert H Stillman — Sun, 17 Jan 2016 17:51:56 +0000

How can we find out how many of the total release of 50K has been sold