Comments on: Woman’s Portrait on $10 Bill, US Treasury Announces

By: Mike

Mike — Tue, 11 Aug 2015 03:09:37 +0000

How about Alfred E. Neuman as a Transexual, then you could call it a “Federal Reverse Note”.

By: Dustin luckeydoo

Dustin luckeydoo — Tue, 11 Aug 2015 02:30:22 +0000

Susan B Anthony.

By: dennis sullivan

dennis sullivan — Thu, 02 Jul 2015 12:55:26 +0000

Stanton, Rosa P arks sacrificed nothing. 440,000 men died in ww2. I would put anyone of them on the bill before I put these women on the bill. Other nations laugh at us- we are truly a nation that has a majority of people who are sheep and just plain stupid but I guess the government and treasury want to appeal to that 75% who are just plain dull and stupid and who would sell out in an instant in order to secure their comfort levels. Putting a woman on a bill for the sake of being a woman is a level of stupid activity – other nations should keep laughing at us. Elizabeth Stanton, Rosa parks- they sacrificed little to nothing. To see one of the Goldbergs pushing to have Rosa Parks makes me disgusted. I won’t use that new 10 or 20 dollar bill if it comes out. If I need cash I will tell bank teller I do not want that bill.
Our nation is going down the drain. I would put most firefighters, police, bus drivers, soldiers, Marines, etc on bill before I put these women who had easy lives. These women did little and sacrificed nothing.

By: Mike

Mike — Thu, 25 Jun 2015 11:03:50 +0000

Well, they ought to put a woman on a Hundred dollar bill, because they sure know how to spend our money.

By: Mike

Mike — Thu, 25 Jun 2015 10:59:44 +0000

or how about Alfred E. Neuman as a cross dresser….what her worry ?

By: TheCurseOfTheRodainTrilogy

TheCurseOfTheRodainTrilogy — Thu, 25 Jun 2015 04:53:08 +0000

I agree with Daryl Strickland, it would be a mistake to remove Hamilton, for no one even comes close to his accomplishments for this country with finances – he should remain on the 10.

By: jim

jim — Tue, 23 Jun 2015 18:06:04 +0000

Whoever it is, best bet would be to go to the moneyfactorystore.gov and buy a $10 currency sheet (4, 8, or 16 uncut bills) before all the current $10 bills wear out and Hamilton’s face disappears forever.

By: Vachon

Vachon — Tue, 23 Jun 2015 08:39:02 +0000

I “like” how once again Congress’s insular thinking is showing in their defense of Hamilton like it did for retaining Monticello on the reverse of the nickel. Hamlton was a good and important man, yes, but like our coins everlasting obsession with dead Presidents, our currency portraiture has been unchanged for almost 90 years.

There are plenty of other worthy honorees and historical vignettes which could be used. I don’t want to go wacky like Canada and honor any which thing but a change once a generation would not be out of line. I honestly think this country missed an opportunity to do a grand redesign during the Bicentennial to showcase American accomplishments and honor those who have either helped preserve or improve upon the Union.

By: Jerry

Jerry — Mon, 22 Jun 2015 17:47:09 +0000

Betsey Ross would be my vote.

By: Darryl Strickland

Darryl Strickland — Mon, 22 Jun 2015 03:44:58 +0000

I do not agree that the $10 bill featuring Alexander Hamilton should be changed. He was the first Treasury Secretary and was responsible for putting the young nation on a firm financial footing.