<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 2015 Proof Set Photos and Debut Sales	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.coinnews.net/2015/04/01/2015-proof-set-photos-and-debut-sales/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2015/04/01/2015-proof-set-photos-and-debut-sales/</link>
	<description>CoinNews delivers the latest World and US coin news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 May 2015 02:18:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Jack		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2015/04/01/2015-proof-set-photos-and-debut-sales/#comment-126273</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2015 20:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=51320#comment-126273</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The 2014 Proof Set sales are nearly 98,000 LESS than the 2013 at this point!  You&#039;ll have to go back to 1956 for a lower mintage on proof sets.  I  have the &#039;56 at 669,384.  Looks like a winner!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 2014 Proof Set sales are nearly 98,000 LESS than the 2013 at this point!  You&#8217;ll have to go back to 1956 for a lower mintage on proof sets.  I  have the &#8217;56 at 669,384.  Looks like a winner!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
