<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: US Mint 12-Month Product Schedule for 2015	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.coinnews.net/2014/12/19/us-mint-12-month-product-schedule-for-2015/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2014/12/19/us-mint-12-month-product-schedule-for-2015/</link>
	<description>CoinNews delivers the latest World and US coin news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2015 20:06:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: jim		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2014/12/19/us-mint-12-month-product-schedule-for-2015/#comment-117509</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2015 20:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=49294#comment-117509</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I looked for the 2014 version because of the Kennedy half dollar which might have had yet another kind of finish for the coin. Apparently they couldn&#039;t decide on what to do - another example of Dep Dir Peterson&#039;s hand in the activities (or lack thereof) of the US Mint.
Otherwise I&#039;ve always felt the limited edition was only a repackaging of coins already issued and that the black and white packaging was unimaginative and way too expensive for coins already offered in other sets. I never bought one of these before and now that 2014 is past it looks like that won&#039;t change.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I looked for the 2014 version because of the Kennedy half dollar which might have had yet another kind of finish for the coin. Apparently they couldn&#8217;t decide on what to do &#8211; another example of Dep Dir Peterson&#8217;s hand in the activities (or lack thereof) of the US Mint.<br />
Otherwise I&#8217;ve always felt the limited edition was only a repackaging of coins already issued and that the black and white packaging was unimaginative and way too expensive for coins already offered in other sets. I never bought one of these before and now that 2014 is past it looks like that won&#8217;t change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jay		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2014/12/19/us-mint-12-month-product-schedule-for-2015/#comment-117475</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2015 15:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=49294#comment-117475</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I also am waiting for the 2014 version of the limited edition silver proof set. Are they even going to have it being ,
as they&#039;ve already determined  there will be a 2015  version of it which I wonder if that will ever happen as well?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also am waiting for the 2014 version of the limited edition silver proof set. Are they even going to have it being ,<br />
as they&#8217;ve already determined  there will be a 2015  version of it which I wonder if that will ever happen as well?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: jim		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2014/12/19/us-mint-12-month-product-schedule-for-2015/#comment-115893</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2014 18:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=49294#comment-115893</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The list is obviously not complete.
I wonder how they can think about a 2015 limited edition sliver proof set when they haven&#039;t even set a date for the 2014 version. But then again it also is in the yet to be determined on sale date list so I wonder if they&#039;ll wait until the end of December for that one too?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The list is obviously not complete.<br />
I wonder how they can think about a 2015 limited edition sliver proof set when they haven&#8217;t even set a date for the 2014 version. But then again it also is in the yet to be determined on sale date list so I wonder if they&#8217;ll wait until the end of December for that one too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mike		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2014/12/19/us-mint-12-month-product-schedule-for-2015/#comment-115663</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2014 18:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=49294#comment-115663</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Where&#039;s the uncirculated ATB San Francisco 40 coin rolls singular offering that I have as a subscription for ? Have they deleted that to favor the PDS collective, and there by now put the S mint into circulation too ?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where&#8217;s the uncirculated ATB San Francisco 40 coin rolls singular offering that I have as a subscription for ? Have they deleted that to favor the PDS collective, and there by now put the S mint into circulation too ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
