<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 2015-2016 Proof American Platinum Eagle Design Candidates	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.coinnews.net/2014/09/30/2015-2016-proof-american-platinum-eagle-design-candidates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2014/09/30/2015-2016-proof-american-platinum-eagle-design-candidates/</link>
	<description>CoinNews delivers the latest World and US coin news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2016 00:45:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: john		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2014/09/30/2015-2016-proof-american-platinum-eagle-design-candidates/#comment-159095</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[john]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2016 00:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=47480#comment-159095</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[9 number....so how much will the 2015 proof increase in value for numestic]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>9 number&#8230;.so how much will the 2015 proof increase in value for numestic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Keep Calm &#38; Stack On		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2014/09/30/2015-2016-proof-american-platinum-eagle-design-candidates/#comment-139344</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Keep Calm &#38; Stack On]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2015 10:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=47480#comment-139344</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Morn&#039;n Mike, it&#039;s coming up on a year since the committee&#039;s recommended design selection, any thoughts when the Treasurer may make the decision or when the mint may release the decision?  

I thought we&#039;d hear something by now and didn&#039;t know if it would be announced in concert with the next CACC meeting or just arbitrarily through a press release.

Also I thought 2015 was supposed to start a new theme series for the APE though these designs seem not to support a single theme.  Thanks!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Morn&#8217;n Mike, it&#8217;s coming up on a year since the committee&#8217;s recommended design selection, any thoughts when the Treasurer may make the decision or when the mint may release the decision?  </p>
<p>I thought we&#8217;d hear something by now and didn&#8217;t know if it would be announced in concert with the next CACC meeting or just arbitrarily through a press release.</p>
<p>Also I thought 2015 was supposed to start a new theme series for the APE though these designs seem not to support a single theme.  Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Baron Spanky McCrankypants		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2014/09/30/2015-2016-proof-american-platinum-eagle-design-candidates/#comment-121437</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baron Spanky McCrankypants]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2015 18:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=47480#comment-121437</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[AEP-R-01, 10, 26, 27, 31 are stomach turningly PC.... in a way appropriate considering what this country has become. Only 17 had any unique character, no wonder it was rejected, and the excuse about the die is laughable.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AEP-R-01, 10, 26, 27, 31 are stomach turningly PC&#8230;. in a way appropriate considering what this country has become. Only 17 had any unique character, no wonder it was rejected, and the excuse about the die is laughable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Clayton		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2014/09/30/2015-2016-proof-american-platinum-eagle-design-candidates/#comment-120490</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clayton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2015 16:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=47480#comment-120490</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[AEP-R-06 for 2015
AEP-R-09 for 2016]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AEP-R-06 for 2015<br />
AEP-R-09 for 2016</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rob		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2014/09/30/2015-2016-proof-american-platinum-eagle-design-candidates/#comment-117407</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2015 01:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=47480#comment-117407</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The only one I like is the one they pulled... finally a design that is a little different and not the same old same old.  The design doesn&#039;t even need a some lame interpretation.  Like Tinto, I don&#039;t buy the Mints excuse either.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only one I like is the one they pulled&#8230; finally a design that is a little different and not the same old same old.  The design doesn&#8217;t even need a some lame interpretation.  Like Tinto, I don&#8217;t buy the Mints excuse either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Charlie Snow		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2014/09/30/2015-2016-proof-american-platinum-eagle-design-candidates/#comment-117375</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charlie Snow]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2015 18:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=47480#comment-117375</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t like any of them.  I think is time to explore something totally new.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t like any of them.  I think is time to explore something totally new.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tinto		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2014/09/30/2015-2016-proof-american-platinum-eagle-design-candidates/#comment-98956</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tinto]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2014 05:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=47480#comment-98956</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I like AEP-R-17  different and bold I thought ..... I don&#039;t buy the Mint excuse for withdrawing it due to hardness of platinum ... why didn&#039;t the Mint determine that BEFORE accepting or submitting the design for consideration in the first place ... seems like a microcosm of the way the Mint functions ... or dysfunctions ....]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like AEP-R-17  different and bold I thought &#8230;.. I don&#8217;t buy the Mint excuse for withdrawing it due to hardness of platinum &#8230; why didn&#8217;t the Mint determine that BEFORE accepting or submitting the design for consideration in the first place &#8230; seems like a microcosm of the way the Mint functions &#8230; or dysfunctions &#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: JesustheLionofJudah		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2014/09/30/2015-2016-proof-american-platinum-eagle-design-candidates/#comment-98953</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JesustheLionofJudah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2014 04:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=47480#comment-98953</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[6, 7, 9 &#038; 19 are the best.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>6, 7, 9 &amp; 19 are the best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: jim		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2014/09/30/2015-2016-proof-american-platinum-eagle-design-candidates/#comment-98880</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2014 15:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=47480#comment-98880</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Interesting that each design needs a description or interpretation of what the image is. Too bad they can&#039;t come up with an image that is self explanatory and doesn&#039;t require a story behind it to justify why it should be used.

Richard - you&#039;re right - except for circulating coins the general public probably doesn&#039;t even know what other coins the US Mint makes.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting that each design needs a description or interpretation of what the image is. Too bad they can&#8217;t come up with an image that is self explanatory and doesn&#8217;t require a story behind it to justify why it should be used.</p>
<p>Richard &#8211; you&#8217;re right &#8211; except for circulating coins the general public probably doesn&#8217;t even know what other coins the US Mint makes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2014/09/30/2015-2016-proof-american-platinum-eagle-design-candidates/#comment-98874</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2014 12:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=47480#comment-98874</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Very beautiful designs.  It&#039;s too bad most Americans will never see even the ones that are used.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very beautiful designs.  It&#8217;s too bad most Americans will never see even the ones that are used.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
