<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 2015 US Marshals Service Commemorative Coin Design Candidates	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.coinnews.net/2014/03/11/2015-us-marshals-service-commemorative-coin-design-candidates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2014/03/11/2015-us-marshals-service-commemorative-coin-design-candidates/</link>
	<description>CoinNews delivers the latest World and US coin news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 May 2014 17:18:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Bob		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2014/03/11/2015-us-marshals-service-commemorative-coin-design-candidates/#comment-74056</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2014 17:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=43339#comment-74056</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I hope that the CCAC keeps to the old west feel of these coins... My vote; G-O-03 with G-R-10 or 11, S-R-06, or 10,S-O-04 or 05, and love the front of C-O-03.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope that the CCAC keeps to the old west feel of these coins&#8230; My vote; G-O-03 with G-R-10 or 11, S-R-06, or 10,S-O-04 or 05, and love the front of C-O-03.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Joe		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2014/03/11/2015-us-marshals-service-commemorative-coin-design-candidates/#comment-70924</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2014 15:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=43339#comment-70924</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Citizen&#039;s Coinage Advisory Committee.  Not a rumor.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Citizen&#8217;s Coinage Advisory Committee.  Not a rumor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: jim		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2014/03/11/2015-us-marshals-service-commemorative-coin-design-candidates/#comment-70917</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2014 01:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=43339#comment-70917</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Who&#039;s &quot;they&quot;? First I&#039;ve heard of a new silver eagle. Is all this just rumor?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who&#8217;s &#8220;they&#8221;? First I&#8217;ve heard of a new silver eagle. Is all this just rumor?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Joe		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2014/03/11/2015-us-marshals-service-commemorative-coin-design-candidates/#comment-70913</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2014 22:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=43339#comment-70913</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I heard one of these eagle designs could be used on the new Silver Eagle they are talking about.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard one of these eagle designs could be used on the new Silver Eagle they are talking about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: pvan		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2014/03/11/2015-us-marshals-service-commemorative-coin-design-candidates/#comment-70869</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pvan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2014 23:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=43339#comment-70869</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[For the silver dollar I&#039;d vote for USM-S-O-03 and more importantly for the reverse USM-S-R-06.  The eagle flying talons extended above the Marshal has a really impressive look to it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the silver dollar I&#8217;d vote for USM-S-O-03 and more importantly for the reverse USM-S-R-06.  The eagle flying talons extended above the Marshal has a really impressive look to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: jim		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2014/03/11/2015-us-marshals-service-commemorative-coin-design-candidates/#comment-70859</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2014 14:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=43339#comment-70859</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I vote for USM-G-O-03, USM-G-R-11 (not that many coin designs have a flying eagle), USM-S-O-04, don&#039;t care for any of the silver reverses except maybe for USM-S-R-10, and none of the clad designs O or R appeal to me.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I vote for USM-G-O-03, USM-G-R-11 (not that many coin designs have a flying eagle), USM-S-O-04, don&#8217;t care for any of the silver reverses except maybe for USM-S-R-10, and none of the clad designs O or R appeal to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Cincinnatus		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2014/03/11/2015-us-marshals-service-commemorative-coin-design-candidates/#comment-70856</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cincinnatus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2014 12:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=43339#comment-70856</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Design Candidate - USM-S-R-06 would be the nicest design to hit the comm coin market in years.  Which means of course the CFA and the CCAC will reject it outright and give us the dumbest, PC design they can come up with.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Design Candidate &#8211; USM-S-R-06 would be the nicest design to hit the comm coin market in years.  Which means of course the CFA and the CCAC will reject it outright and give us the dumbest, PC design they can come up with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
