<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 2013 Proof Australian Gold Sovereign Coin Debuts	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.coinnews.net/2013/05/06/2013-proof-australian-gold-sovereign-coin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2013/05/06/2013-proof-australian-gold-sovereign-coin/</link>
	<description>CoinNews delivers the latest World and US coin news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 09:24:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Alan		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2013/05/06/2013-proof-australian-gold-sovereign-coin/#comment-63738</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 09:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=37014#comment-63738</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I understand the numismatic fetish for reproductions of old coin designs, but usually a reproduced design has some merit of its own, whether novelty or beauty. I wonder if this design will appeal to anybody other than the most devoted of Sovereign collectors?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand the numismatic fetish for reproductions of old coin designs, but usually a reproduced design has some merit of its own, whether novelty or beauty. I wonder if this design will appeal to anybody other than the most devoted of Sovereign collectors?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
