<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 2013-W Proof American Gold Eagles Released	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.coinnews.net/2013/04/18/2013-w-proof-american-gold-eagles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2013/04/18/2013-w-proof-american-gold-eagles/</link>
	<description>CoinNews delivers the latest World and US coin news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Apr 2013 23:19:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Vachon		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2013/04/18/2013-w-proof-american-gold-eagles/#comment-63240</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vachon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Apr 2013 23:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=36505#comment-63240</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I still don&#039;t get why in 1986 when they started this program, that they didn&#039;t just use the last four gold coin designs. They could&#039;ve been rounded to 1 tr.oz., ½ tr.oz., ¼ tr.oz., and an eighth or a tenth for the last size but still, four designs. Okay, three unless they&#039;d&#039;ve used the Coronet Head for the $2½ size. Wouldn&#039;t the mint have sold more that way because people would want to build the set? I hope the idea was at least floated back then. Such a lost opportunity...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still don&#8217;t get why in 1986 when they started this program, that they didn&#8217;t just use the last four gold coin designs. They could&#8217;ve been rounded to 1 tr.oz., ½ tr.oz., ¼ tr.oz., and an eighth or a tenth for the last size but still, four designs. Okay, three unless they&#8217;d&#8217;ve used the Coronet Head for the $2½ size. Wouldn&#8217;t the mint have sold more that way because people would want to build the set? I hope the idea was at least floated back then. Such a lost opportunity&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Kevin		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2013/04/18/2013-w-proof-american-gold-eagles/#comment-63229</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Apr 2013 04:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=36505#comment-63229</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Did someone say that due to price averaging, the Mint may reduce gold eagle proof prices further this coming week, even if gold remains steady or advances a little?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did someone say that due to price averaging, the Mint may reduce gold eagle proof prices further this coming week, even if gold remains steady or advances a little?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
