<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: American Palladium Eagle Study Ready for Congress	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.coinnews.net/2013/03/01/american-palladium-eagle-study-ready-for-congress/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2013/03/01/american-palladium-eagle-study-ready-for-congress/</link>
	<description>CoinNews delivers the latest World and US coin news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 14:33:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: jim		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2013/03/01/american-palladium-eagle-study-ready-for-congress/#comment-64946</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 14:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=35174#comment-64946</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Why do you think they wouldn&#039;t? Even if they didn&#039;t the designs are unique between the three different metals so that should be sufficient, especially for those who can&#039;t read. I give the mint till 2016 to come out with a palladium coin and if they don&#039;t by then they never will.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do you think they wouldn&#8217;t? Even if they didn&#8217;t the designs are unique between the three different metals so that should be sufficient, especially for those who can&#8217;t read. I give the mint till 2016 to come out with a palladium coin and if they don&#8217;t by then they never will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jeff Beedham		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2013/03/01/american-palladium-eagle-study-ready-for-congress/#comment-64940</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Beedham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 05:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=35174#comment-64940</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I hope they stamp the word Palladium on there with the purity like other Government minted Precious Metal coins. This could become a serious problem during resell as Palladium looks very similar to Silver and Platinum.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope they stamp the word Palladium on there with the purity like other Government minted Precious Metal coins. This could become a serious problem during resell as Palladium looks very similar to Silver and Platinum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2013/03/01/american-palladium-eagle-study-ready-for-congress/#comment-62619</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 21:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=35174#comment-62619</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This is really a shame.  We need more quality of quantity.  The mint should stop issuing so many variations on pocket change and issue something meaningful and new like a palladium coin.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is really a shame.  We need more quality of quantity.  The mint should stop issuing so many variations on pocket change and issue something meaningful and new like a palladium coin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2013/03/01/american-palladium-eagle-study-ready-for-congress/#comment-62364</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 19:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=35174#comment-62364</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[On a related note:

To all you collectors out there with more experience and wisdom than I:

If you want your collections to hold or grow in value, we&#039;ll need to get the Mint to draw in more young collectors with exotic, new, and exciting coins - even with an old hobby such as this.  And I don&#039;t mean all the overabundance of boring that the Mint is issuing since the 50 state quarters program.  It was fun until the 50th State when we all realized our collections halved in value at the end and insult was added to the injury when the Mint kept coming up with every reason under the sun to pump similar quantities of coins out.  

Quality over Quantity please?  Since collecting is driven 100% by desire (not need), there&#039;s a lot the US Mint could learn about quality from the most desirable brands in the world.  Perhaps oddly, perhaps not, European fashion brands come to mind - Chanel, Prada, Louis Vuitton, Burberry, Apple... wait.. Apple?  Yes, Apple&#039;s success has come from a European approach, which is why it was so misunderstood by American analysts at the beginning of it&#039;s rocket ride.  These brands know that they&#039;ll sell anything they make if they push quality to the forefront, focusing all their public efforts into driving desirability.  A desirable brand with THE desirable product sells huge.  

The last several years have brought some great examples of quality in International coinage: France, Spain, and the Netherlands are your leaders in design innovation.  And they&#039;re not just adding avant-guarde graphic designs of subjects that are actually interesting; they&#039;re physically innovating.  Exotic metals, multiple metals, coins within coins, technologically-advanced aesthetics, wavy planchets, etc (please let&#039;s not resort to coloration though - else coins really become kitch trinkets).  They&#039;re only downfall is price (too high) and market (too weak, poor Europe).  But the design is spot on and somehow the French mint still sells out relentlessly.

So bring on the Palladium coin.  Relative to these European mints, it&#039;s even conservative... yet so oh so nice.  Perhaps most accurately, it&#039;s the US Mint&#039;s iPod/iPad... questioned by the misunderstanding analysts; yearned for by collections... to be (or sadly not to be) the coin of coins.

I guess we&#039;ll know by March 1, 2014.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On a related note:</p>
<p>To all you collectors out there with more experience and wisdom than I:</p>
<p>If you want your collections to hold or grow in value, we&#8217;ll need to get the Mint to draw in more young collectors with exotic, new, and exciting coins &#8211; even with an old hobby such as this.  And I don&#8217;t mean all the overabundance of boring that the Mint is issuing since the 50 state quarters program.  It was fun until the 50th State when we all realized our collections halved in value at the end and insult was added to the injury when the Mint kept coming up with every reason under the sun to pump similar quantities of coins out.  </p>
<p>Quality over Quantity please?  Since collecting is driven 100% by desire (not need), there&#8217;s a lot the US Mint could learn about quality from the most desirable brands in the world.  Perhaps oddly, perhaps not, European fashion brands come to mind &#8211; Chanel, Prada, Louis Vuitton, Burberry, Apple&#8230; wait.. Apple?  Yes, Apple&#8217;s success has come from a European approach, which is why it was so misunderstood by American analysts at the beginning of it&#8217;s rocket ride.  These brands know that they&#8217;ll sell anything they make if they push quality to the forefront, focusing all their public efforts into driving desirability.  A desirable brand with THE desirable product sells huge.  </p>
<p>The last several years have brought some great examples of quality in International coinage: France, Spain, and the Netherlands are your leaders in design innovation.  And they&#8217;re not just adding avant-guarde graphic designs of subjects that are actually interesting; they&#8217;re physically innovating.  Exotic metals, multiple metals, coins within coins, technologically-advanced aesthetics, wavy planchets, etc (please let&#8217;s not resort to coloration though &#8211; else coins really become kitch trinkets).  They&#8217;re only downfall is price (too high) and market (too weak, poor Europe).  But the design is spot on and somehow the French mint still sells out relentlessly.</p>
<p>So bring on the Palladium coin.  Relative to these European mints, it&#8217;s even conservative&#8230; yet so oh so nice.  Perhaps most accurately, it&#8217;s the US Mint&#8217;s iPod/iPad&#8230; questioned by the misunderstanding analysts; yearned for by collections&#8230; to be (or sadly not to be) the coin of coins.</p>
<p>I guess we&#8217;ll know by March 1, 2014.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2013/03/01/american-palladium-eagle-study-ready-for-congress/#comment-62363</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 19:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=35174#comment-62363</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Since collecting is not simply a rational action – a need – but a rationalization brought on by our desires, feelings, and opinions – our wants – I just wanted to offer a glimpse into mine… those forming the opinion of a young collector. And I’d love to know if any one feels the same way, because I strongly feel it’s these thoughts that really drive the collector’s markets.

PLATINUM I’ve never been remotely interested in our platinum coins for two reasons: 1) I love the statue of liberty, but on a coin she looks like a cliche – like a tourist trinket. There are already many more sophisticated liberties out there to choose from (if we think of sophistication as being embodied by anything that’s harder to describe – this goes for colors, art, people – this starts to makes sense). 2) Super high prices + an unchanging design = why would I ever collect that? (I don’t collect our gold coins for the same reason, although I’ve considered them, based solely on their beauty)

PALLADIUM
I’ve also never bought a palladium coin from another country – simply because the designs are… well… simple. An interesting metal needs an interesting design, and similarly, an expensive metal needs a sophisticated design – one drawing from the highest works of art. It’s basic marketing really – all the components need to align in order to appeal to your target market.

And that’s why this coin MUST get made. Next to the 2009 Ultra High Reliefs, this is the most desirable idea the mint’s had since I started collecting very young, 19 years ago (I’m 32).

1) It’s exotic, new, and exciting.
2) It’s of a material that is extremely rare
3) Yet the prices are attainable
4) The obverse portrays one of the most elegant “liberties” ever designed, so it’s just the opposite of the cliche on our platinum coins.
5) The reverse is a refreshing take on a very sophisticated version of our eagle – on the level of the UHR’s – and leagues better than the platinum’s flat design and looks as if [UN]inspired from a poor photo.
6) And it will come out in a new finish every year? Are you kidding me? This sounds too good to be true!

I don’t think I’ve ever wanted to collect a coin with such a passion.

Anyone feel similarly?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since collecting is not simply a rational action – a need – but a rationalization brought on by our desires, feelings, and opinions – our wants – I just wanted to offer a glimpse into mine… those forming the opinion of a young collector. And I’d love to know if any one feels the same way, because I strongly feel it’s these thoughts that really drive the collector’s markets.</p>
<p>PLATINUM I’ve never been remotely interested in our platinum coins for two reasons: 1) I love the statue of liberty, but on a coin she looks like a cliche – like a tourist trinket. There are already many more sophisticated liberties out there to choose from (if we think of sophistication as being embodied by anything that’s harder to describe – this goes for colors, art, people – this starts to makes sense). 2) Super high prices + an unchanging design = why would I ever collect that? (I don’t collect our gold coins for the same reason, although I’ve considered them, based solely on their beauty)</p>
<p>PALLADIUM<br />
I’ve also never bought a palladium coin from another country – simply because the designs are… well… simple. An interesting metal needs an interesting design, and similarly, an expensive metal needs a sophisticated design – one drawing from the highest works of art. It’s basic marketing really – all the components need to align in order to appeal to your target market.</p>
<p>And that’s why this coin MUST get made. Next to the 2009 Ultra High Reliefs, this is the most desirable idea the mint’s had since I started collecting very young, 19 years ago (I’m 32).</p>
<p>1) It’s exotic, new, and exciting.<br />
2) It’s of a material that is extremely rare<br />
3) Yet the prices are attainable<br />
4) The obverse portrays one of the most elegant “liberties” ever designed, so it’s just the opposite of the cliche on our platinum coins.<br />
5) The reverse is a refreshing take on a very sophisticated version of our eagle – on the level of the UHR’s – and leagues better than the platinum’s flat design and looks as if [UN]inspired from a poor photo.<br />
6) And it will come out in a new finish every year? Are you kidding me? This sounds too good to be true!</p>
<p>I don’t think I’ve ever wanted to collect a coin with such a passion.</p>
<p>Anyone feel similarly?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2013/03/01/american-palladium-eagle-study-ready-for-congress/#comment-62362</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 19:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=35174#comment-62362</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think the design limitations were a good choice, given the designs the mint comes up with otherwise.  Until we start breeding sculptors of the talent of St. Gaudens or Weinman again (which with figurative art making a come-back after 50 years in the trenches, I&#039;m hopeful this may happen), and until the mint stops hiring photographers for engravers, let&#039;s stick with using these real art pieces.  Else we get another platinum liberty: an exhorbitantly costly kitch design, obverse resembling a tourist trinket and a reverse that can&#039;t even fill out the field.  And again, what&#039;s with them designing directly from photo&#039;s?  Have we forgotten the desirability of the allegory that can come from [the right] artist&#039;s hand?  Come on.  

Palladium beauty.... we anxiously await.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the design limitations were a good choice, given the designs the mint comes up with otherwise.  Until we start breeding sculptors of the talent of St. Gaudens or Weinman again (which with figurative art making a come-back after 50 years in the trenches, I&#8217;m hopeful this may happen), and until the mint stops hiring photographers for engravers, let&#8217;s stick with using these real art pieces.  Else we get another platinum liberty: an exhorbitantly costly kitch design, obverse resembling a tourist trinket and a reverse that can&#8217;t even fill out the field.  And again, what&#8217;s with them designing directly from photo&#8217;s?  Have we forgotten the desirability of the allegory that can come from [the right] artist&#8217;s hand?  Come on.  </p>
<p>Palladium beauty&#8230;. we anxiously await.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: CW		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2013/03/01/american-palladium-eagle-study-ready-for-congress/#comment-61928</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CW]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 17:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=35174#comment-61928</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#039;Winged liberty is a ridiculous concept in present day Amerika.&#039;  I agree.  Who needs the Constitution too?  It was written by a bunch of dead guys.  No wonder this country is screwed.  Attitudes like this seem to be becoming mainstream.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Winged liberty is a ridiculous concept in present day Amerika.&#8217;  I agree.  Who needs the Constitution too?  It was written by a bunch of dead guys.  No wonder this country is screwed.  Attitudes like this seem to be becoming mainstream.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: jim		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2013/03/01/american-palladium-eagle-study-ready-for-congress/#comment-61879</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2013 14:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=35174#comment-61879</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Shawn - I don&#039;t doubt that that was his intent. And yes, you can always not buy the coin; however I would suggest you at least buy the first one since the starter coin is always more popular than others and more in demand. Then unless metals prices change dramatically you could cash in when the 10th anniversary coin(s) come out.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shawn &#8211; I don&#8217;t doubt that that was his intent. And yes, you can always not buy the coin; however I would suggest you at least buy the first one since the starter coin is always more popular than others and more in demand. Then unless metals prices change dramatically you could cash in when the 10th anniversary coin(s) come out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Shawn		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2013/03/01/american-palladium-eagle-study-ready-for-congress/#comment-61878</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shawn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2013 14:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=35174#comment-61878</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Jim,
I have read the bill and you are totally correct. My apologies. I guess the representative wanted a coin that would support the Montana state palladium mines and put together a complete package. 
It is still an ugly design lacking any imagination in my opinion. Winged liberty is a ridiculous concept in present day Amerika. It is a minority opinion as supposedly, many people love it. I can always vote with my dollars.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim,<br />
I have read the bill and you are totally correct. My apologies. I guess the representative wanted a coin that would support the Montana state palladium mines and put together a complete package.<br />
It is still an ugly design lacking any imagination in my opinion. Winged liberty is a ridiculous concept in present day Amerika. It is a minority opinion as supposedly, many people love it. I can always vote with my dollars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: thePhelps		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2013/03/01/american-palladium-eagle-study-ready-for-congress/#comment-61873</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thePhelps]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2013 11:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=35174#comment-61873</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I actually like the idea of using the classic designs. I especially like the Eagle on this design. Now I have to start digging the copper Lincolns out and count em up to see if I have any chance of buying 1 of these.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually like the idea of using the classic designs. I especially like the Eagle on this design. Now I have to start digging the copper Lincolns out and count em up to see if I have any chance of buying 1 of these.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
