<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: US Mint Coin Production Jumps 34.8% in March, 2.16B Coins Minted in Q1 2012	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.coinnews.net/2012/04/10/us-mint-coin-production-jumps-34-8-in-march/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2012/04/10/us-mint-coin-production-jumps-34-8-in-march/</link>
	<description>CoinNews delivers the latest World and US coin news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 15:46:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: george glazener		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2012/04/10/us-mint-coin-production-jumps-34-8-in-march/#comment-50248</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[george glazener]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 17:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=27090#comment-50248</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Definitely like the idea of a $2.00 Coin w/ Teddy Roosevelt on it. But given the disdain that most retailers showed when I tried my best to circulate the $1.00 Presidential dollars, I think there would be a lot of negative reaction and a resistance to embrace them. In the end, most folks just don&#039;t want to lug around bulky clanky coins in their pockets]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely like the idea of a $2.00 Coin w/ Teddy Roosevelt on it. But given the disdain that most retailers showed when I tried my best to circulate the $1.00 Presidential dollars, I think there would be a lot of negative reaction and a resistance to embrace them. In the end, most folks just don&#8217;t want to lug around bulky clanky coins in their pockets</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Munzen		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2012/04/10/us-mint-coin-production-jumps-34-8-in-march/#comment-50193</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Munzen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 02:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=27090#comment-50193</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Foo. No edit button.  Not &quot;a year ago&quot;, &quot;YEARS ago&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Foo. No edit button.  Not &#8220;a year ago&#8221;, &#8220;YEARS ago&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Munzen		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2012/04/10/us-mint-coin-production-jumps-34-8-in-march/#comment-50192</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Munzen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 02:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=27090#comment-50192</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I have to agree with billymac. TR has been sadly neglected. IMO he definitely should be honored, not just because of the changes he brought about in our coins but for the steps he took to move our country onto the world stage. If not on an existing denomination, why not on a distinctive $2 coin or bill that could short-circuit some of the bleatings about &quot;carrying too many $1 coins&quot; if the $1 bill ever meets its much-delayed end?

IMHO it seems that the Mint is currently doing what cereal makers discovered a year ago: it&#039;s easier to create &quot;new&quot; products by endlessly tweaking existing ones than it is to produce something truly different. Cents through halves each have some major part of their design that&#039;s been essentially the same for at least a half-century.  At what point does continuity become stagnation?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with billymac. TR has been sadly neglected. IMO he definitely should be honored, not just because of the changes he brought about in our coins but for the steps he took to move our country onto the world stage. If not on an existing denomination, why not on a distinctive $2 coin or bill that could short-circuit some of the bleatings about &#8220;carrying too many $1 coins&#8221; if the $1 bill ever meets its much-delayed end?</p>
<p>IMHO it seems that the Mint is currently doing what cereal makers discovered a year ago: it&#8217;s easier to create &#8220;new&#8221; products by endlessly tweaking existing ones than it is to produce something truly different. Cents through halves each have some major part of their design that&#8217;s been essentially the same for at least a half-century.  At what point does continuity become stagnation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: JP		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2012/04/10/us-mint-coin-production-jumps-34-8-in-march/#comment-49681</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JP]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 14:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=27090#comment-49681</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I have to believe that at some point we&#039;ll have enough coins minted that we can lay off the mint for a couple of years.  Due to their longevity I&#039;m still regularly finding coins from the 60&#039;s in my change, so I&#039;d think that we could save some money by throttling down the mint&#039;s production schedule a tad.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to believe that at some point we&#8217;ll have enough coins minted that we can lay off the mint for a couple of years.  Due to their longevity I&#8217;m still regularly finding coins from the 60&#8217;s in my change, so I&#8217;d think that we could save some money by throttling down the mint&#8217;s production schedule a tad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: billymac11		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2012/04/10/us-mint-coin-production-jumps-34-8-in-march/#comment-49672</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[billymac11]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 13:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=27090#comment-49672</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I would tend to think that the time will have come by the end of ATB to introduce a whole new (single!) design for the quarter, as much as I like the Washington Quarter. Maybe it should be Teddy Roosevelt, which would have made oh-so-much sense for the obverse of ATB, but that opportunity was missed.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would tend to think that the time will have come by the end of ATB to introduce a whole new (single!) design for the quarter, as much as I like the Washington Quarter. Maybe it should be Teddy Roosevelt, which would have made oh-so-much sense for the obverse of ATB, but that opportunity was missed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: jim		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2012/04/10/us-mint-coin-production-jumps-34-8-in-march/#comment-49631</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 07:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=27090#comment-49631</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[And we have another 8 yrs @ 4 quarters per year to go. I don&#039;t know about you but I&#039;m looking forward to seeing the old quarter reverse again. In fact I&#039;ve been spending the state and ATB quarters and keeping the old quarters I get in my change.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And we have another 8 yrs @ 4 quarters per year to go. I don&#8217;t know about you but I&#8217;m looking forward to seeing the old quarter reverse again. In fact I&#8217;ve been spending the state and ATB quarters and keeping the old quarters I get in my change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Vachon		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2012/04/10/us-mint-coin-production-jumps-34-8-in-march/#comment-49541</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vachon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 21:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=27090#comment-49541</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I wonder when the glut of State Quarters will have finally passed? At the current rates of ATB quarter production, will the entire series even surpass 1999&#039;s mintage of state quarters?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder when the glut of State Quarters will have finally passed? At the current rates of ATB quarter production, will the entire series even surpass 1999&#8217;s mintage of state quarters?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
