<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: PCGS-Certified 1793 Chain Cent Sets $1.38M Record in Heritage&#8217;s FUN Auction	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.coinnews.net/2012/01/06/pcgs-certified-1793-chain-cent-sets-1-38m-record-in-heritages-fun-auction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2012/01/06/pcgs-certified-1793-chain-cent-sets-1-38m-record-in-heritages-fun-auction/</link>
	<description>CoinNews delivers the latest World and US coin news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 07:17:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: David		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2012/01/06/pcgs-certified-1793-chain-cent-sets-1-38m-record-in-heritages-fun-auction/#comment-43281</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 07:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=24821#comment-43281</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m counting 15 rings on the back]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m counting 15 rings on the back</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Vachon		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2012/01/06/pcgs-certified-1793-chain-cent-sets-1-38m-record-in-heritages-fun-auction/#comment-43188</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vachon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 21:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=24821#comment-43188</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Did the U.S. mint even have equipment capable of making an MS-65 coin back in 1793? Just because the coin is rare does not mean its grade should be inflated. I&#039;m looking at you, Farouk 1933 double eagle.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did the U.S. mint even have equipment capable of making an MS-65 coin back in 1793? Just because the coin is rare does not mean its grade should be inflated. I&#8217;m looking at you, Farouk 1933 double eagle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
