<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: CONECA ErrorScope Issue Features Doubled Die Cent, Double Struck JFK	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.coinnews.net/2011/08/08/coneca-errorscope-issue-features-doubled-die-cent-double-struck-jfk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2011/08/08/coneca-errorscope-issue-features-doubled-die-cent-double-struck-jfk/</link>
	<description>CoinNews delivers the latest World and US coin news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2017 17:31:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: david rogers		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2011/08/08/coneca-errorscope-issue-features-doubled-die-cent-double-struck-jfk/#comment-194147</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[david rogers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2017 17:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=21090#comment-194147</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I would love to send this 1999 kennedy half dollar error to someone
for evaluation. I it a most fascinating piece..quite even possibly a one
only known to exist!    thank you.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would love to send this 1999 kennedy half dollar error to someone<br />
for evaluation. I it a most fascinating piece..quite even possibly a one<br />
only known to exist!    thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: david rogers		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2011/08/08/coneca-errorscope-issue-features-doubled-die-cent-double-struck-jfk/#comment-194146</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[david rogers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2017 17:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=21090#comment-194146</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[at my bank I got some half dollar rolls to look through..i found something incredible a 1999 kennedy half dollar struck on a quarter sheet inteneded
for quarters!  same size as a normal half dollar but the exact thickness of
a quarter! even more amazing is that it has a reeded edge!! I had a theory
about this particular coin is that back in 1999..you had the first major change
in quarters..the state quarter program,and in turn a LOT of things were 
happening at the mint to get these new design coins out there..henceforth
many thousands of quarter sheets were being readied for production and
somehow a sheet got to a kennedy half dollar die and got produced! I even
came to another conclusion that somehow this could be a test piece! it has
a reeded edge..so maybe they were testing a cost-cutting measure to
make thinner kennedy halves by utilizing the quarter sheet for exactly that
goal! to save on budgetary concerns!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>at my bank I got some half dollar rolls to look through..i found something incredible a 1999 kennedy half dollar struck on a quarter sheet inteneded<br />
for quarters!  same size as a normal half dollar but the exact thickness of<br />
a quarter! even more amazing is that it has a reeded edge!! I had a theory<br />
about this particular coin is that back in 1999..you had the first major change<br />
in quarters..the state quarter program,and in turn a LOT of things were<br />
happening at the mint to get these new design coins out there..henceforth<br />
many thousands of quarter sheets were being readied for production and<br />
somehow a sheet got to a kennedy half dollar die and got produced! I even<br />
came to another conclusion that somehow this could be a test piece! it has<br />
a reeded edge..so maybe they were testing a cost-cutting measure to<br />
make thinner kennedy halves by utilizing the quarter sheet for exactly that<br />
goal! to save on budgetary concerns!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ed Wisniewski		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2011/08/08/coneca-errorscope-issue-features-doubled-die-cent-double-struck-jfk/#comment-67229</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ed Wisniewski]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2013 20:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=21090#comment-67229</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Have you heard of a major ddr on a 51 pr quarter? I can&#039;t send it in until late Oct. I  am not good on errors. Also remarkable is how the reverse looks like a strong cameo, with a section of the inner wing (left side) with a mirror like appearance. The strike looks a bit off center. The appearance of the breast looks too heavy, almost caked, strong strike but the features are not well defined - hard to describe. The obv looks like a pr 67. The reverse&#039;s appearance makes it too difficult to grade. Rim letters are not proportional. this may suggest a DDR as well.  I never thought to use a 10x magnify
to look at it.

If there are rumors of a major error .... perhaps ....  this may be a superior example; until U see the coin .... before drawing any conclusions. I have a so-so, not too good .  I can try a photo; if so, do u have a preferred email?     Thanks Ed]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you heard of a major ddr on a 51 pr quarter? I can&#8217;t send it in until late Oct. I  am not good on errors. Also remarkable is how the reverse looks like a strong cameo, with a section of the inner wing (left side) with a mirror like appearance. The strike looks a bit off center. The appearance of the breast looks too heavy, almost caked, strong strike but the features are not well defined &#8211; hard to describe. The obv looks like a pr 67. The reverse&#8217;s appearance makes it too difficult to grade. Rim letters are not proportional. this may suggest a DDR as well.  I never thought to use a 10x magnify<br />
to look at it.</p>
<p>If there are rumors of a major error &#8230;. perhaps &#8230;.  this may be a superior example; until U see the coin &#8230;. before drawing any conclusions. I have a so-so, not too good .  I can try a photo; if so, do u have a preferred email?     Thanks Ed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
