<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: US Mint Suspends Two Products as Silver Prices Top &#036;40	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.coinnews.net/2011/04/08/us-mint-suspends-two-products-as-silver-prices-top-40/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2011/04/08/us-mint-suspends-two-products-as-silver-prices-top-40/</link>
	<description>CoinNews delivers the latest World and US coin news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 May 2011 16:50:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Mike		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2011/04/08/us-mint-suspends-two-products-as-silver-prices-top-40/#comment-32521</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 14:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=12151#comment-32521</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I have always ejoyed the mint products and have made a point to get the commems in proof and uncirc.  I also get the mint sets more as something to collect with my kids.

However with the price of silver and the cost of these sets - just to buy one of each - not including the gold - will run $463.55. And lets face it, many of the commems and the silver proof sets will only be worth the bullion price in the future - so basically it is a negative return investment unless silver continues to go up.

I look at it this way $463.55 will buy me a nice slabbed Morgan or a capped bust half - something that will continue to hold value and will limited means I would rather put my money in the old classics. 

Looks like my mint purchases are coming to an end.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have always ejoyed the mint products and have made a point to get the commems in proof and uncirc.  I also get the mint sets more as something to collect with my kids.</p>
<p>However with the price of silver and the cost of these sets &#8211; just to buy one of each &#8211; not including the gold &#8211; will run $463.55. And lets face it, many of the commems and the silver proof sets will only be worth the bullion price in the future &#8211; so basically it is a negative return investment unless silver continues to go up.</p>
<p>I look at it this way $463.55 will buy me a nice slabbed Morgan or a capped bust half &#8211; something that will continue to hold value and will limited means I would rather put my money in the old classics. </p>
<p>Looks like my mint purchases are coming to an end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: jim		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2011/04/08/us-mint-suspends-two-products-as-silver-prices-top-40/#comment-32501</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2011 14:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=12151#comment-32501</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I didn&#039;t either, but there it is. And at that time gold only peaked at $850 or so but it was the silver price that was driving up gold then too, not the world economy.

They should have added silver products to the pricing grid when they originally announced the 5oz coins instead of hiding in a closet. Also if palladium coins become a reality the pricing grid should be upgraded for them before any are announced or at least released for sale.

The mint administrators seem to have no capability of planning or forethought beyond tomorrow&#039;s or next week&#039;s production and as SirCharlie mentioned in his comment on the Fuljenz article Apr 7 no care to produce commemorative coins of significant beauty but rather humdrum designs that are sufficient to get the job done but no more.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t either, but there it is. And at that time gold only peaked at $850 or so but it was the silver price that was driving up gold then too, not the world economy.</p>
<p>They should have added silver products to the pricing grid when they originally announced the 5oz coins instead of hiding in a closet. Also if palladium coins become a reality the pricing grid should be upgraded for them before any are announced or at least released for sale.</p>
<p>The mint administrators seem to have no capability of planning or forethought beyond tomorrow&#8217;s or next week&#8217;s production and as SirCharlie mentioned in his comment on the Fuljenz article Apr 7 no care to produce commemorative coins of significant beauty but rather humdrum designs that are sufficient to get the job done but no more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Frank		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2011/04/08/us-mint-suspends-two-products-as-silver-prices-top-40/#comment-32493</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frank]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 21:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=12151#comment-32493</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[US Mint really need to have the pricing grid ready for Silver product lines now, as they do for gold and platinum. I couldn&#039;t have imagined silver price bouncing back to the Hunt brothers&#039; level in my life time. Gee.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>US Mint really need to have the pricing grid ready for Silver product lines now, as they do for gold and platinum. I couldn&#8217;t have imagined silver price bouncing back to the Hunt brothers&#8217; level in my life time. Gee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
