<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Coin Modernization Act to Become Law	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.coinnews.net/2010/12/06/coin-modernization-act-to-become-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2010/12/06/coin-modernization-act-to-become-law/</link>
	<description>CoinNews delivers the latest World and US coin news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 14:01:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Munzen		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2010/12/06/coin-modernization-act-to-become-law/#comment-32232</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Munzen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 01:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=9386#comment-32232</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yeah, I was hoping for some meaningful revisions too. We&#039;re stuck with size relationships and denominations that made sense in the era of silver coins but that ended almost a half-century ago. 

Plus it&#039;s ridiculous for the Mint to have to send nearly every decision through Congress where the pols can grandstand and meddle. I was in the UK when the Royal Mint did studies on introducing a new 20p coin to fill the gap between 10p and 50p.  They tried a bunch of different shapes and designs, even conducted usability studies, and made their decision without every member of Parliament having to chime in. The coin worked so well that within a week of its introduction people were using it regularly.  Here, the Virginia delegation managed to paralyze Congress when the Mint simply tried to put a new design on the nickel.  Foo.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I was hoping for some meaningful revisions too. We&#8217;re stuck with size relationships and denominations that made sense in the era of silver coins but that ended almost a half-century ago. </p>
<p>Plus it&#8217;s ridiculous for the Mint to have to send nearly every decision through Congress where the pols can grandstand and meddle. I was in the UK when the Royal Mint did studies on introducing a new 20p coin to fill the gap between 10p and 50p.  They tried a bunch of different shapes and designs, even conducted usability studies, and made their decision without every member of Parliament having to chime in. The coin worked so well that within a week of its introduction people were using it regularly.  Here, the Virginia delegation managed to paralyze Congress when the Mint simply tried to put a new design on the nickel.  Foo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ryan North		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2010/12/06/coin-modernization-act-to-become-law/#comment-28732</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan North]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 04:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=9386#comment-28732</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[^I agree.  We need to simplify our currency system.  Make a new &quot;smaller&quot; Half Dollar, push for removal of $1 bill, and penny.  I&#039;m also not opposed of a $2 coin as well, although I do love using $2 bills.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^I agree.  We need to simplify our currency system.  Make a new &#8220;smaller&#8221; Half Dollar, push for removal of $1 bill, and penny.  I&#8217;m also not opposed of a $2 coin as well, although I do love using $2 bills.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Derek		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2010/12/06/coin-modernization-act-to-become-law/#comment-28696</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derek]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 22:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=9386#comment-28696</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What a letdown. By &quot;modernization,&quot; I was hoping to read that all coins would use numerical digits to identify themselves (instead of &quot;one dime&quot; or &quot;quarter dollar&quot;) and that we would see a $2 coin put into production to bring us in line with more modern countries like Canada.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a letdown. By &#8220;modernization,&#8221; I was hoping to read that all coins would use numerical digits to identify themselves (instead of &#8220;one dime&#8221; or &#8220;quarter dollar&#8221;) and that we would see a $2 coin put into production to bring us in line with more modern countries like Canada.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
