<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: US Mint September 2010 Coin Production: Cents Top 3 Billion, Quarters Change	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.coinnews.net/2010/10/18/us-mint-september-2010-coin-production-cents-top-3-billion-quarters-change/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2010/10/18/us-mint-september-2010-coin-production-cents-top-3-billion-quarters-change/</link>
	<description>CoinNews delivers the latest World and US coin news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 15:49:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Gerald		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2010/10/18/us-mint-september-2010-coin-production-cents-top-3-billion-quarters-change/#comment-28374</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gerald]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 13:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=8039#comment-28374</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The U.S. mint does not seem to be concerned about perceived value of the products they sell.   They place a premium on the items, often much more than they will eventually be worth, and now they are going back to mint additional ATB quarters!    I guess after the 2009 dime debacle, they want to ensure that premium is only paid to the mint rather than to collectors!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. mint does not seem to be concerned about perceived value of the products they sell.   They place a premium on the items, often much more than they will eventually be worth, and now they are going back to mint additional ATB quarters!    I guess after the 2009 dime debacle, they want to ensure that premium is only paid to the mint rather than to collectors!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jack		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2010/10/18/us-mint-september-2010-coin-production-cents-top-3-billion-quarters-change/#comment-28347</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 20:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=8039#comment-28347</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Looks like the Lincoln &quot;Gold&quot; Dollars&#039; mintages will be 39.2M for Denver and 39.9M for Philly.  Does anyone feel that these will have collectablity at these mintage levels?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like the Lincoln &#8220;Gold&#8221; Dollars&#8217; mintages will be 39.2M for Denver and 39.9M for Philly.  Does anyone feel that these will have collectablity at these mintage levels?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Vachon		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2010/10/18/us-mint-september-2010-coin-production-cents-top-3-billion-quarters-change/#comment-28342</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vachon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 07:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=8039#comment-28342</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The minting of new quarters whose striking time has already passed sets a bad precedent. That should not have been allowed to happen.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The minting of new quarters whose striking time has already passed sets a bad precedent. That should not have been allowed to happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
