<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: US Mint June Coin Production Surges, 2010-D Nickel Mintage Added	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.coinnews.net/2010/07/09/us-mint-june-coin-production-surges-2010-d-nickel-mintage-added/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2010/07/09/us-mint-june-coin-production-surges-2010-d-nickel-mintage-added/</link>
	<description>CoinNews delivers the latest World and US coin news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 May 2011 16:29:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Vachon		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2010/07/09/us-mint-june-coin-production-surges-2010-d-nickel-mintage-added/#comment-27993</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vachon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 13:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=5637#comment-27993</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@John : A customer paid me with a 2009-P nickel late in November 2009. To date, that is the only 2009 dated nickel I have seen. It&#039;s been fun searching through change again.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@John : A customer paid me with a 2009-P nickel late in November 2009. To date, that is the only 2009 dated nickel I have seen. It&#8217;s been fun searching through change again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: John		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2010/07/09/us-mint-june-coin-production-surges-2010-d-nickel-mintage-added/#comment-27679</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 04:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=5637#comment-27679</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yes the 2010 NIckels and dimes will be regular run of the mill coins.  But 2009 will continue to shine for years to come.  I have some tubes on my desk, and as I search coins each day in my spare time I keep ALL 2009 nickels and dimes I can find.  Which is NOT MUCH.  Less than a roll of EACH denomination, and i don&#039;t even separate by mint.  Over $15,000 in nickels searched this year alone (2010) and I&#039;ve found THREE TOTAL 2009 nickels.  Just starting to find some 2010 D nickels 9Since they started making them again) but three total of the 2009.  One every $5,000!  (one every 50 boxes!!) I  find more silver WAR nickels than I do 2009 nickels.  Yep, keep every one you can luckily find!  Same for the 2009 dimes.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes the 2010 NIckels and dimes will be regular run of the mill coins.  But 2009 will continue to shine for years to come.  I have some tubes on my desk, and as I search coins each day in my spare time I keep ALL 2009 nickels and dimes I can find.  Which is NOT MUCH.  Less than a roll of EACH denomination, and i don&#8217;t even separate by mint.  Over $15,000 in nickels searched this year alone (2010) and I&#8217;ve found THREE TOTAL 2009 nickels.  Just starting to find some 2010 D nickels 9Since they started making them again) but three total of the 2009.  One every $5,000!  (one every 50 boxes!!) I  find more silver WAR nickels than I do 2009 nickels.  Yep, keep every one you can luckily find!  Same for the 2009 dimes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: CoinNews.net		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2010/07/09/us-mint-june-coin-production-surges-2010-d-nickel-mintage-added/#comment-25708</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CoinNews.net]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 16:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=5637#comment-25708</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks Michael, the body of the copy was right, but the table total was not. We made the correction.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Michael, the body of the copy was right, but the table total was not. We made the correction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Michael		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2010/07/09/us-mint-june-coin-production-surges-2010-d-nickel-mintage-added/#comment-25702</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 05:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=5637#comment-25702</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think the Yellowstone quarter numbers are off...

34,800,000 Denver 33,600,000 Philly and 38,400,000 total 

(should be 68,400,000 ?)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the Yellowstone quarter numbers are off&#8230;</p>
<p>34,800,000 Denver 33,600,000 Philly and 38,400,000 total </p>
<p>(should be 68,400,000 ?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Vachon		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2010/07/09/us-mint-june-coin-production-surges-2010-d-nickel-mintage-added/#comment-25694</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vachon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 17:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=5637#comment-25694</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The dream&#039;s over for 2010 nickels. They were the last hope for beating last year&#039;s low totals and now Denver is poised to pass last years probably this month. I was also hoping either mint would come in below a billion for the cents this year. That&#039;s not gonna happen either. Sigh... 2009 it is...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The dream&#8217;s over for 2010 nickels. They were the last hope for beating last year&#8217;s low totals and now Denver is poised to pass last years probably this month. I was also hoping either mint would come in below a billion for the cents this year. That&#8217;s not gonna happen either. Sigh&#8230; 2009 it is&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
