<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Large Cents Exhibit Highlights June 2010 Long Beach Coin Expo	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.coinnews.net/2010/05/18/large-cents-exhibit-highlights-june-2010-long-beach-coin-expo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2010/05/18/large-cents-exhibit-highlights-june-2010-long-beach-coin-expo/</link>
	<description>CoinNews delivers the latest World and US coin news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 May 2011 16:16:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Vachon		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2010/05/18/large-cents-exhibit-highlights-june-2010-long-beach-coin-expo/#comment-23333</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vachon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 18:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=4724#comment-23333</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[How is it that that 1793 chain cent is graded MS-65 by PCGS when it has very visible gouge marks on it. It puts PCGS&#039;s grading abilities in doubt. I don&#039;t think anyone honestly expects a perfect coin from that era. It&#039;s clearly well-preserved, but it is not an MS-65.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is it that that 1793 chain cent is graded MS-65 by PCGS when it has very visible gouge marks on it. It puts PCGS&#8217;s grading abilities in doubt. I don&#8217;t think anyone honestly expects a perfect coin from that era. It&#8217;s clearly well-preserved, but it is not an MS-65.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
