Comments on: 2010 US Mint Uncirculated Set https://www.coinnews.net/2010/03/03/2010-us-mint-uncirculated-set/ CoinNews delivers the latest World and US coin news Wed, 15 Nov 2017 04:08:22 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0 By: rick laws https://www.coinnews.net/2010/03/03/2010-us-mint-uncirculated-set/#comment-271219 Wed, 15 Nov 2017 04:08:22 +0000 http://www.coinnews.net/?p=3174#comment-271219 I have the yellow stone set guess I will keep them for a while.

]]> By: the x https://www.coinnews.net/2010/03/03/2010-us-mint-uncirculated-set/#comment-17461 Wed, 03 Mar 2010 19:24:32 +0000 http://www.coinnews.net/?p=3174#comment-17461 the 2011 mint sets could have mostly steel coins in it.

]]> By: Vachon https://www.coinnews.net/2010/03/03/2010-us-mint-uncirculated-set/#comment-17457 Wed, 03 Mar 2010 11:14:07 +0000 http://www.coinnews.net/?p=3174#comment-17457 I don’t understand why the mint and proof sets aren’t released the FOLLOWING year rather than the year of. I know in modern times that it’s unlikely that a coin of a particular denomination or mint won’t be produced (or sometimes WILL BE) but you never know.

Take 1999 for example. Had the mint waited until 2000 to release those sets, they would’ve included the SBA dollar that the mint clearly did not expect to be produced that year and was forced to include as a special proof sold separately. 1987 would not have included half dollars. 1938 would have included both the Buffalo and Jefferson nickels. And so forth.

It’s possible 2010 could see no production of nickels but they’ll be in sets regardless. It doesn’t seem right to me.

]]>