<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 2011 America the Beautiful Quarter Designs, CCAC Reviews	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.coinnews.net/2010/02/26/2011-america-the-beautiful-quarter-designs-ccac-reviews/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2010/02/26/2011-america-the-beautiful-quarter-designs-ccac-reviews/</link>
	<description>CoinNews delivers the latest World and US coin news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 May 2011 15:55:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: anonamus		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2010/02/26/2011-america-the-beautiful-quarter-designs-ccac-reviews/#comment-28592</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[anonamus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 22:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/?p=3075#comment-28592</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[i am totally for the iron clad for vicksburg. it would make a narly design. the other choises for the quarters are ok too.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i am totally for the iron clad for vicksburg. it would make a narly design. the other choises for the quarters are ok too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
