<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Two-Headed Coins are Flops in Value but Cute as Pranks	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.coinnews.net/2007/10/04/two-headed-coins-are-flops-in-value-but-cute-as-pranks-3587/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2007/10/04/two-headed-coins-are-flops-in-value-but-cute-as-pranks-3587/</link>
	<description>CoinNews delivers the latest World and US coin news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2023 01:47:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Scott Harlow		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2007/10/04/two-headed-coins-are-flops-in-value-but-cute-as-pranks-3587/#comment-521044</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Harlow]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2023 01:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/2007/10/04/two-headed-coins-are-flops-in-value-but-cute-as-pranks-3587/#comment-521044</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.coinnews.net/2007/10/04/two-headed-coins-are-flops-in-value-but-cute-as-pranks-3587/#comment-46677&quot;&gt;christelle jecrois&lt;/a&gt;.

I just was going thru a roll of nickels a few days ago and come across a two-headed nickels, 1964 on one side, 1997 on the other side.  And the &quot;reverse&quot; was oriented the same as the obverse,  minus about 30°. Looking at the edge of the nickel, I cud see a &quot;fusion line&quot; most of the way around the nickel. What a shame, lmfao!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.coinnews.net/2007/10/04/two-headed-coins-are-flops-in-value-but-cute-as-pranks-3587/#comment-46677">christelle jecrois</a>.</p>
<p>I just was going thru a roll of nickels a few days ago and come across a two-headed nickels, 1964 on one side, 1997 on the other side.  And the &#8220;reverse&#8221; was oriented the same as the obverse,  minus about 30°. Looking at the edge of the nickel, I cud see a &#8220;fusion line&#8221; most of the way around the nickel. What a shame, lmfao!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ken Kocanda		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2007/10/04/two-headed-coins-are-flops-in-value-but-cute-as-pranks-3587/#comment-460121</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ken Kocanda]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jul 2019 21:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/2007/10/04/two-headed-coins-are-flops-in-value-but-cute-as-pranks-3587/#comment-460121</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I made my 2 headed coins, machined em in a Lathe, then super glued the 2 halves together. Work good when flipping coins for a bet!!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I made my 2 headed coins, machined em in a Lathe, then super glued the 2 halves together. Work good when flipping coins for a bet!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Paul		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2007/10/04/two-headed-coins-are-flops-in-value-but-cute-as-pranks-3587/#comment-323466</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2018 19:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/2007/10/04/two-headed-coins-are-flops-in-value-but-cute-as-pranks-3587/#comment-323466</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[With all of these different coins that are made and considered fake why aren&#039;t the people that are making them considered counter fitters??]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With all of these different coins that are made and considered fake why aren&#8217;t the people that are making them considered counter fitters??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rob Mcginnis		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2007/10/04/two-headed-coins-are-flops-in-value-but-cute-as-pranks-3587/#comment-270810</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob Mcginnis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Nov 2017 03:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/2007/10/04/two-headed-coins-are-flops-in-value-but-cute-as-pranks-3587/#comment-270810</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[2000 gold dollar Sacagawea one with both heads one with both tails/no date ... Whats the value or where do I locate such information]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2000 gold dollar Sacagawea one with both heads one with both tails/no date &#8230; Whats the value or where do I locate such information</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sandy		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2007/10/04/two-headed-coins-are-flops-in-value-but-cute-as-pranks-3587/#comment-182383</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sandy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2016 03:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/2007/10/04/two-headed-coins-are-flops-in-value-but-cute-as-pranks-3587/#comment-182383</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Well, in 1970  I was given a 1970 double headed nickel, and a 1970 double tailed nickel  by someone  who said he worked at the mint, (DC)  Never thought much about them possibly being fakes, just figured they struck them because they could. So just assuming they were real, what would the value have been today?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, in 1970  I was given a 1970 double headed nickel, and a 1970 double tailed nickel  by someone  who said he worked at the mint, (DC)  Never thought much about them possibly being fakes, just figured they struck them because they could. So just assuming they were real, what would the value have been today?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rob Bozdag		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2007/10/04/two-headed-coins-are-flops-in-value-but-cute-as-pranks-3587/#comment-178742</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob Bozdag]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Sep 2016 17:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/2007/10/04/two-headed-coins-are-flops-in-value-but-cute-as-pranks-3587/#comment-178742</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[NL - Read the article and you shall find your answer.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NL &#8211; Read the article and you shall find your answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: NL		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2007/10/04/two-headed-coins-are-flops-in-value-but-cute-as-pranks-3587/#comment-173580</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2016 01:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/2007/10/04/two-headed-coins-are-flops-in-value-but-cute-as-pranks-3587/#comment-173580</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What brought me here was finding a double headed liberty nickel among my father&#039;s things. I think the article could have been written about me as I thought I had found the find of the century!  Sadly, I realize that&#039;s not the case; however, the nickels are dated 1888 and 1889. Other than a novelty, is there any value in the age of the coin?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What brought me here was finding a double headed liberty nickel among my father&#8217;s things. I think the article could have been written about me as I thought I had found the find of the century!  Sadly, I realize that&#8217;s not the case; however, the nickels are dated 1888 and 1889. Other than a novelty, is there any value in the age of the coin?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Luis		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2007/10/04/two-headed-coins-are-flops-in-value-but-cute-as-pranks-3587/#comment-172757</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Luis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2016 20:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/2007/10/04/two-headed-coins-are-flops-in-value-but-cute-as-pranks-3587/#comment-172757</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I thought it was interesting to find a double head with 1916-1917 liberty quarter.  Its still unique even tho its obviously fake from what I read here]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought it was interesting to find a double head with 1916-1917 liberty quarter.  Its still unique even tho its obviously fake from what I read here</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sharon Fischer		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2007/10/04/two-headed-coins-are-flops-in-value-but-cute-as-pranks-3587/#comment-172383</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sharon Fischer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2016 00:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/2007/10/04/two-headed-coins-are-flops-in-value-but-cute-as-pranks-3587/#comment-172383</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I found a printed double sided wheat penny dated 1941.
I found it buried deep in the ground next to the train tracks.
It is not hollow.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found a printed double sided wheat penny dated 1941.<br />
I found it buried deep in the ground next to the train tracks.<br />
It is not hollow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Amber		</title>
		<link>https://www.coinnews.net/2007/10/04/two-headed-coins-are-flops-in-value-but-cute-as-pranks-3587/#comment-126595</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amber]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2015 22:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coinnews.net/2007/10/04/two-headed-coins-are-flops-in-value-but-cute-as-pranks-3587/#comment-126595</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve found a double headed Kennedy half dollar and both sides are 1980 D. I did the sound drop and compared it to a real one and they sound exactly the same. Am I somehow doing it wrong? Sorry if this seems like a stupid question. :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve found a double headed Kennedy half dollar and both sides are 1980 D. I did the sound drop and compared it to a real one and they sound exactly the same. Am I somehow doing it wrong? Sorry if this seems like a stupid question. 🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
